|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 1993): |
"How much do you get paid if I volunteer?" Suggested institutional policy on reward, consent, and research.
Full Abstract
Pharmaceutical companies often ask practicing physicians to conduct phase IV or postmarketing research on new drugs. Companies pay physicians to enroll their patients and report dosage and side-effect information. Postmarketing research embraces a multibillion dollar effort at promotion and familiarization, but subjects' informed consent to it normally does not include physician reward. Improving investigators' financial status while increasing medical risks to phase IV subjects is ethically unsound, especially if subjects are unaware of investigators' rewards. We suggest a model policy and guidelines that affirm subjects' need for informed consent, investigators' need for recognition and support, and institutions' need to protect patients from undisclosed risk and relations.
Author information
Author/s: La Puma, J (J); Kraut, J (J);
Affiliation: Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Hospital & health services administration (Hosp Health Serv Adm), published in UNITED STATES. (Language: eng)
Reference: 1994-; vol 39 (issue 2) : pp 193-203
Dates: Created 1994/07/18; Completed 1994/07/18; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 10134417, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.
Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.
Related articles
These are the most related articles currently in our database:
- Clinical research: protection of the "vulnerable"?
2 Mar 2008 - Patients' perception of the informed consent process for neurooncology clinical trials.
Apr 2008 - Currents in contemporary ethics: ethical and practical concerns in developing payment policies for research involving children and adolescents.
30 Dec 2007 - Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA.
30 Dec 2007 - Malawians permit research bronchoscopy due to perceived need for healthcare.
30 Mar 2008 - Improving disclosure and consent: "is it safe?": new ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals.
29 Jul 2007 - Impact of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act on participant recruitment and retention.
3 Jun 2007 - A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research.
30 Jul 2007 - Unconscious emotional reasoning and the therapeutic misconception.
28 Feb 2008 - Is it ethical to keep interim findings of randomised controlled trials confidential?
28 Feb 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a larger map of 100+ related articles.