|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jul 1999): |
Faulty judgment, expert opinion, and decision-making capacity.
Full Abstract
An assessment of decision-making capacity is the accepted procedure for determining when a person is not competent. An inferential gap exists between the criteria for capacity specific abilities and the legal requirements to understand relevant information and appreciate the consequences of a decision. This gap extends to causal influences on a person's capacity to decide. Using a published case of depression, we illustrate that assessors' uses of diagnostic information is frequently not up to the task of bridging this inferential gap in a justifiable way. We then describe cases of faulty judgement which challenge the understanding of diagnostic causal influences. These cases help to clarify the nature of the expertise required for capacity assessments. In practice, the requirements of decision-making capacity are often abandoned to other considerations due to a lack of requisite expertise. The legal policy supporting decision-making capacity as a means to protective intervention is justified only if the requisite expertise is developed. We propose the requisite expertise to be developed in the long term as a distinct multidisciplinary endeavour.
Author information
Author/s: Silberfeld, M (M); Checkland, D (D);
Affiliation: Competency Clinic, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, North York, ON, Canada. michel.silberfeld(-atsign-)utoronto.ca
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
Journal: Theoretical medicine and bioethics (Theor Med Bioeth), published in NETHERLANDS. (Language: eng)
Reference: 1999-Aug; vol 20 (issue 4) : pp 377-93
Dates: Created 1999/12/09; Completed 1999/12/09; Revised 2005/11/16;
PMID: 10548932, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- [Psychotherapy patients with severe somatic diseases--necessary stringency of the conciliar physician procedure]
30 Dec 2006 - Assessing decision-making capacity: a survey of psychiatrists' knowledge.
30 Dec 2005 - [Advance refusal of treatment in case of loss of autonomy due to persistent brain disease]
30 Aug 2006 - The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials.
30 Dec 2006 - A pilot Rasch scaling of lawyers' perceptions of expert bias.
30 Dec 2005 - Losing your rights: complications of misdiagnosis.
30 Dec 2005 - Characteristics of physicians who frequently act as expert witnesses in neurologic birth injury litigation.
30 Jul 2006 - Advice from a medical expert through the Internet on queries about AIDS and hepatitis: analysis of a pilot experiment.
29 Jun 2006 - [Characteristics of the most important accidental health impairments in the population of the insured in PZU group]
29 Sep 2005 - Diagnostic labeling in juvenile court: how do descriptions of psychopathy and conduct disorder influence judges?
30 Mar 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.