Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 30 Jul 2000):

Cognitive strategies for reporting portion sizes using dietary recall procedures.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine recall strategies used by interview respondents when making judgments about portion size and to better understand how respondents use various portion-size aids. DESIGN: Study participants were separated into groups, each using a different set of portion-size estimation aids: (a) 2-dimensional paper aids presented in stacks, (b) 2-dimensional aids, cut out and presented on rings, (c) household-type aids, and (d) a combination of 2- and 3-dimensional aids, many of which are used in national government surveys. Respondents gave a "quick list" of foods consumed the previous day and practiced cognitive thinking skills. Then the interviewer selected at least 2 solid, 2 liquid, and 2 amorphous foods for probing. Respondents were asked to think aloud as they reported how much they ate of each food. Types and frequencies of cognitive strategies used for portion-size estimation were determined. SUBJECTS: Interviews of 1 to 1 1/2 hours were conducted with 76 adults aged 18 to 65 years. Participants were recruited to obtain a mix of races, ages, educational levels, and genders. RESULTS: The most frequently used strategy was visualization and comparison to aids. Others strategies were known amounts, estimations based on known amounts, visualization of volume or a container, and actions such as pouring or moving hands to the mouth. Respondents preferred aids that were similar in size and shape to actual portions consumed for liquid or amorphous food and preferred the ruler for solid foods. APPLICATIONS: To obtain the best data from dietary recalls, expect answers that are possible for respondents to give, supply respondents with aids that help them recall amounts consumed, and guide respondents to appropriate aids that help them formulate focused responses.

 

Author information

Author/s: Chambers, E (E); Godwin, S L (SL); Vecchio, F A (FA);

Affiliation: Sensory Analysis Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-1407, USA.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Journal: Journal of the American Dietetic Association (J Am Diet Assoc), published in UNITED STATES. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2000-Aug; vol 100 (issue 8) : pp 891-7

Dates: Created 2000/08/30; Completed 2000/08/30; Revised 2007/11/15;

PMID: 10955046, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

11/12/2007
7/30/2008
Higher Relevance Score (11)
Lower Relevance Score (8)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy LLC 2003-2009 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index