Ethnobotanical survey in the Palestinian area: a classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants.

Full Abstract

An ethnobotanical survey was carried out in the West Bank to evaluate the relative efficacy of the plants used to treat skin diseases and prostate cancer. A total number of 102 informants, 30 years and older and either native born or had been living in the West Bank for more than 30 years, were interviewed using a previously prepared questionnaire. Of about 165 plant species mentioned by the informants, 63 (38.1%) were mentioned by three or more informants. On the basis of their primary uses, 21 of these plants were reported to relieve skin disorders, 17 for urinary system disorders, 16 for gastric disorders, nine for cancer and prostate disorders, eight for arthritis, five for respiratory problems, and five for other ailments. Indices on fidelity levels (FLs), relative popularity level (RPL), and rank-order priority (ROP) were calculated. Plants were classified in two groups: 'popular' (RPL=1) or 'unpopular' (RPL<1). The following plant species were classified as popular in this study: Teucrium polium, Matricaria aurea, Urtica pilulifera, Paronychia argentea, Petroselinum sativum, and Salvia fruticosa. The remaining 57 species were classified as 'unpopular'. Fifty-nine plants were claimed to be effective against cancer and prostate disorders, which include Arum dioscorides, U. pilulifera, Allium sativum, Viscum cruciatum, and Allium cepa.

Author information

Author/s: Ali-Shtayeh, M S (MS); Yaniv, Z (Z); Mahajna, J (J);

Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 696, Palestine, West Bank, Nablus, Israel. shtayeh(-atsign-)zaytona.com

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Journal of ethnopharmacology (J Ethnopharmacol), published in IRELAND. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2000-Nov; vol 73 (issue 1-2) : pp 221-32

Dates: Created 2001/01/04; Completed 2001/01/04; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 11025160, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.