|
|
| Research article summary (published 28 Feb 2000): |
Peer evaluation in nurses' professional development: a pilot study to investigate the issues.
Full Abstract
Peer evaluation in nursing is a method by which the nurse evaluates the work of a peer, according to set evaluation criteria. The aim of the study was to clarify the potential significance of peer evaluation with regard to nurses' career development and relates to the introduction of a career development programme for nurses in a Finnish University Hospital. The research concepts were created on the basis of literature analysis. The concepts served as a basis for data collection, and five open-ended questions were devised from them. Informants (n = 24) gave free-form essay-type answers to these questions. The material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. The results indicate that self-evaluation constitutes the basis for peer evaluation. Peer evaluation allows nurses to give and receive professional and personal support promoting professional development. Professional support offers possibilities for change and alternative action. Personal support requires respect for the peer's equality and individuality. Personal peer support can decrease feelings of uncertainty and insecurity caused by work. The conclusion is drawn that peer evaluation is a means of promoting nurses' professional development to further on-the-job learning in collaboration with peers.
Author information
Author/s: Vuorinen, R (R); Tarkka, M T (MT); Meretoja, R (R);
Affiliation: Eye & Ear Hospital, Surgical Unit, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Journal of clinical nursing (J Clin Nurs), published in ENGLAND. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2000-Mar; vol 9 (issue 2) : pp 273-81
Dates: Created 2001/01/04; Completed 2001/01/04; Revised 2004/11/17;
PMID: 11111619, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Staff nurses writing for their peers: development of self-learning modules.
30 Oct 2007 - Participatory inquiry with a colleague: an innovative faculty development process.
27 Feb 2005 - Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.
30 May 2003 - [Application of derivative Dolphe method in the constitution of practice guidelines on prevention and treatment of hypertension for primary care physicians]
29 Nov 2002 - Standards for peer evaluation: the hospital quality assurance committee.
30 Mar 1992 - Peer review. Part 1: Attitudes to internal and external standards.
21 Jan 1991 - The use of interprofessional peer examiners in an objective structured clinical examination: can dental students act as examiners?
10 Aug 2000 - Medical students' experience of academic review and promotions committees.
30 Dec 2003 - Peer review: a castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing?
30 Jan 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.