|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jan 2002): |
Testing an instrument measuring Greek nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain.
Full Abstract
This pretest-post-test study was conducted to test the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain with Greek nurses. Forty-six registered nurses were randomly assigned to an expert or nonexpert group. The expert group viewed 4 translated educational videotapes about pain management. The nonexpert group received no pain education. All of the nurses completed a pretest and a post-test using a Greek translation of the Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain, with a time delay of 8 to 12 days between testing. The expert nurses learned significantly more than the nonexpert nurses from pretest to post-test, M = 9.0 and M = 1.5 items, respectively. Expert and nonexpert nurses correctly answered 51.5% and 43.3% of the pretest and 74.6% and 47.2% of the post-test questions, respectively. Test-retest reliability for the 28 nonexpert nurses was r = 0.68, P < .001. Cronbach's alpha for the entire sample was 0.88 (n = 30) at the post-test. These results contribute to the validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain and provide the basis for phase II of the study, which will use the Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain to examine the state of pain management in an anticancer facility in Greece.
Author information
Author/s: Tafas, Cheryl A (CA); Patiraki, Elisabeth (E); McDonald, Deborah Dillon (DD); Lemonidou, Chryssoula (C);
Affiliation: University of Connecticut School of Nursing, Storrs 06269-2026, USA.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Cancer nursing (Cancer Nurs), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Feb; vol 25 (issue 1) : pp 8-14
Dates: Created 2002/02/12; Completed 2002/03/08; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 11838724, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- When the world health organization analgesic therapies ladder fails: the role of invasive analgesic therapies.
30 Aug 2003 - Knowledge and attitudes about cancer pain management: a national survey of Italian oncology nurses.
14 Nov 2006 - Knowledge and attitudes about cancer pain management: a national survey of Italian hospice nurses.
27 Feb 2007 - Nurses' response to pain communication from patients: a post-test experimental study.
21 Jan 2006 - Improving cancer pain management using a performance improvement framework.
30 Mar 1999 - Patients' and nurses' assessment of cancer pain.
29 Nov 1999 - Clinical competence in pain assessment.
29 Sep 2000 - Nurses' knowledge and skills in colonoscopy patients' pain management.
30 May 2007 - Alignment of pain reassessment practices and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
29 Apr 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.