Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2002):

Reliability and validity of two isometric squat tests.

Full Abstract

The purpose of the present study was first to examine the reliability of isometric squat (IS) and isometric forward hack squat (IFHS) tests to determine if repeated measures on the same subjects yielded reliable results. The second purpose was to examine the relation between isometric and dynamic measures of strength to assess validity. Fourteen male subjects performed maximal IS and IFHS tests on 2 occasions and 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) free-weight squat and forward hack squat (FHS) tests on 1 occasion. The 2 tests were found to be highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC](IS) = 0.97 and ICC(IFHS) = 1.00). There was a strong relation between average IS and 1-RM squat performance, and between IFHS and 1-RM FHS performance (r(squat) = 0.77, r(FHS) = 0.76; p < 0.01), but a weak relation between squat and FHS test performances (r < 0.55). There was also no difference between observed 1-RM values and those predicted by our regression equations. Errors in predicting 1-RM performance were in the order of 8.5% (standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 13.8 kg) and 7.3% (SEE = 19.4 kg) for IS and IFHS respectively. Correlations between isometric and 1-RM tests were not of sufficient size to indicate high validity of the isometric tests. Together the results suggest that IS and IFHS tests could detect small differences in multijoint isometric strength between subjects, or performance changes over time, and that the scores in the isometric tests are well related to 1-RM performance. However, there was a small error when predicting 1-RM performance from isometric performance, and these tests have not been shown to discriminate between small changes in dynamic strength. The weak relation between squat and FHS test performance can be attributed to differences in the movement patterns of the tests

 

Author information

Author/s: Blazevich, Anthony J (AJ); Gill, Nicholas (N); Newton, Robert U (RU);

Affiliation: Department of Sports Science, Brunel University, Osterley Campus, Middlesex TW7 5DU, UK. anthony.blazevich(-atsign-)brunel.ac.uk

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Validation Studies

Journal: Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association (J Strength Cond Res), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2002-May; vol 16 (issue 2) : pp 298-304

Dates: Created 2002/05/06; Completed 2002/07/17; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 11991785, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

10/30/1994
12/9/2007
Higher Relevance Score (12)
Lower Relevance Score (10)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy LLC 2003-2009 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index