|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Nov 2002): |
Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?
Full Abstract
This paper examines whether self-controlled feedback schedules enhance learning, because they are more tailored to the performers' needs than externally controlled feedback schedules. Participants practiced a sequential timing task. One group of learners (self-control) was provided with feedback whenever they requested it, whereas another group (yoked) had no influence on the feedback schedule. The self-control group showed learning benefits on a delayed transfer test. Questionnaire results revealed that self-control learners asked for feedback primarily after good trials and yoked learners preferred to receive feedback after good trials. Analyses demonstrated that errors were lower on feedback than no-feedback trials for the self-control group but not for the yoked group. Thus, self-control participants appeared to use a strategy for requesting feedback. This might explain learning advantages of self-controlled practice.
Author information
Author/s: Chiviacowsky, Suzete (S); Wulf, Gabriele (G);
Affiliation: School of Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil. schivi(-atsign-)terra.com.br
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Research quarterly for exercise and sport (Res Q Exerc Sport), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Dec; vol 73 (issue 4) : pp 408-15
Dates: Created 2002/12/23; Completed 2003/03/18; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 12495242, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Using concurrent visual feedback to focus attention in bimanual aiming movements.
29 Nov 2002 - Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results without visual feedback in learning a golf-putting task.
30 Jan 2008 - Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern.
30 May 2002 - Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.
30 Jan 2002 - Evidence for training-induced crossmodal reorganization of cortical functions in trumpet players.
18 Jan 2003 - Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference.
6 Nov 2003 - Frontomedian activation depends on both feedback validity and valence: fMRI evidence for contextual feedback evaluation.
30 Aug 2005 - The influence of augmented feedback and prior learning on the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination pattern.
14 May 2006 - Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas.
27 Feb 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.