|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Nov 2002): |
How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests.
Full Abstract
Twenty-five undergraduate students were instructed to feign believable impairment following a brain injury from a car accident and 27 students were told to perform like they had recovered from such an injury. Three forced-choice tests, the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT), and Word Memory Test (WMT) were given. Test-taking strategies were evaluated by means of a questionnaire given at the end of the test session. The results revealed that all the tasks differentiated between groups. Using conventional cut-scores, the WMT proved most efficient while the VSVT captured the most participants in the definitive below-chance category. Individuals instructed to feign injury were more likely to prepare prior to the experiment, with feigning of memory loss as the most frequently reported strategy. Regardless, preparation effort did not translate into believable performance on the tests.
Author information
Author/s: Tan, Jing Ee (JE); Slick, Daniel J (DJ); Strauss, Esther (E); Hultsch, David F (DF);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. jtan(-atsign-)uvic.ca
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: The Clinical neuropsychologist (Clin Neuropsychol), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Dec; vol 16 (issue 4) : pp 495-505
Dates: Created 2003/06/24; Completed 2003/07/23; Revised 2007/06/01;
PMID: 12822058, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- [Symptom Validity Testing (SVT) in the suspicion of a simulation or exaggeration of neurocognitive symptoms--a case report]
30 May 2004 - Detecting simulation of attention deficits using reaction time tests.
6 Nov 2005 - Effort issues in post-acute outpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation seekers.
30 Dec 2007 - Validity indicators within the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: application of new and previously researched multivariate procedures in multiple traumatic brain injury samples.
29 Nov 2002 - Classification accuracy of the Portland Digit Recognition Test in traumatic brain injury: results of a known-groups analysis.
29 Nov 2006 - Neuropsychological impairments, vocational outcomes, and financial costs for individuals with traumatic brain injury receiving state vocational rehabilitation services.
30 May 1999 - How low is too low, revisited: sentence repetition and AVLT-recognition in the detection of malingering.
30 Dec 2000 - Classification accuracy of the portland digit recognition test in traumatic brain injury.
29 Nov 2001 - Utility of the trail making test in the assessment of malingering in a sample of mild traumatic brain injury litigants.
30 Jan 2003
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.