|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Nov 2003): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
Technology in the teaching of neuroscience: enhanced student learning.
Full Abstract
The primary motivation for integrating any form of education technology into a particular course or curriculum should always be to enhance student learning. However, it can be difficult to determine which technologies will be the most appropriate and effective teaching tools. Through the alignment of technology-enhanced learning experiences with a clear set of learning objectives, teaching becomes more efficient and effective and learning is truly enhanced. In this article, I describe how I have made extensive use of technology in two neuroscience courses that differ in structure and content. Course websites function as resource centers and provide a forum for student interaction. PowerPoint presentations enhance formal lectures and provide an organized outline of presented material. Some lectures are also supplemented with interactive CD-ROMs, used in the presentation of difficult physiological concepts. In addition, a computer-based physiological recording system is used in laboratory sessions, improving the hands-on experience of group learning while reinforcing the concepts of the research method. Although technology can provide powerful teaching tools, the enhancement of the learning environment is still dependent on the instructor. It is the skill and enthusiasm of the instructor that determines whether technology will be used effectively.
Author information
Author/s: Griffin, John D (JD);
Affiliation: Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA. jdgri2(-atsign-)wm.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Journal: Advances in physiology education (Adv Physiol Educ), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-Dec; vol 27 (issue 1-4) : pp 146-55
Dates: Created 2003/08/20; Completed 2004/02/06; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 12928323, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Brains rule! fun = learning = neuroscience literacy.
29 Sep 2002 - Efficient validation of teaching and learning using multiple-choice exams.
29 Nov 2003 - Neuroscience training at the turn of the century: a summary report of the third annual ANDP survey.
29 Apr 2000 - Student test scores are improved in a virtual learning environment.
30 May 2000 - Online in less time.
30 Jul 2001 - Recruiting future neuroscientists: what asking the recruits can teach us.
29 Nov 2004 - Integrated problem-based learning in the neuroscience curriculum--the SUNY Downstate experience.
16 Sep 2006 - Neuroscience education of undergraduate medical students. Part II: outcome improvement.
30 Mar 2000 - A survey of neuroscience courses for predoctoral dental students.
30 May 2000
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.