|
|
| Research article summary (published 7 Mar 2004): |
Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.
Full Abstract
In a repetitive tapping task, the within-hand variability of intertap intervals is reduced when participants tap with both hands instead of single-handedly. This bimanual advantage has been attributed to timer as opposed to motor variance (according to the Wing-Kristofferson model; Helmuth and Ivry 1996) and related to the additional sensory consequences of the movement of the extra hand in the bimanual case (Drewing et al. 2002). In the present study the effect of sensory feedback of the movement on this advantage was investigated by comparing the results of a person (IW) deafferented below the neck with those of age-matched controls. IW showed an even more pronounced bimanual advantage than controls, suggesting that the bimanual advantage is not due to actual sensory feedback. These results support another hypothesis, namely that bimanual timing profits from the averaging of different central control signals that relate to each effector's movements.
Author information
Author/s: Drewing, Knut (K); Stenneken, Prisca (P); Cole, Jonathan (J); Prinz, Wolfgang (W); Aschersleben, Gisa (G);
Affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. knut.drewing(-atsign-)tuebingen.mpg.de
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation cérébrale (Exp Brain Res), published in Germany. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2004-Sep; vol 158 (issue 1) : pp 50-7
Dates: Created 2004/08/04; Completed 2004/12/13; Revised 2009/11/11;
PMID: 15007586, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/11/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Failure to disrupt the 'sensorimotor' memory for lifting objects with a precision grip.
22 Aug 2007 - Two types of phase correction mechanism involved in synchronized tapping.
18 Feb 2007 - Postural stabilization from fingertip contact II. Relationships between age, tactile sensibility and magnitude of contact forces.
6 Mar 2005 - Does the location of the touch from the contralateral finger application affect grip force control while lifting an object?
7 Aug 2007 - Cutaneomotor integration in human hand motor areas: somatotopic effect and interaction of afferents.
30 Oct 2001 - Dependence of reactive responses in human bimanual finger movements on sensory feedback and auditory cues.
3 Nov 2003 - Contribution of tactile information to accuracy in pointing movements.
30 May 2001 - Further insight into the task-dependent excitability of motor evoked potentials in first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans.
29 Sep 2001 - Independent movements of the digits in grasping.
29 Jun 2001 - Comparison of pencil-grip patterns in first graders with good and poor writing skills.
30 Jul 1991
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.