Acquired brain injury, visual attention, and the useful field of view test: A pilot study.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the findings of the Useful Field of View (UFOV) test with those of conventional neuropsychologic tests to determine the utility of the UFOV test as a measure of attention in a population with brain injury. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Freestanding rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen inpatients with severe brain injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: UFOV test, FIMT instrument, length of stay (LOS), and standard neuropsychologic testing. RESULTS: The UFOV subtest UF2 correlated strongly with the other 2 subtests, UF1 and UF3. The UF2 subtest correlated most strongly with paper and pencil tests of visual attention. The UF2 predicted 52% of the FIM change and 60% of the LOS variance, second only to admission FIM score, which predicted 75% and 80% of FIM change and LOS variance, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients in our study, the UFOV test can be used to determine the visual divided attention of patients with acquired brain injury. The results also showed that the UFOV test correlated with LOS and FIM change in patients with acquired brain injury recovering in a rehabilitation facility. Because the UFOV test is much more quickly administered and scored than other measures of attention and divided attention, these results suggest that the UFOV test may provide an easy means to measure a critical variable in the population with head injury.

Author information

Author/s: Calvanio, Ron (R); Williams, Rebecca (R); Burke, David T (DT); Mello, Jennifer (J); Lepak, Paige (P); Al-Adawi, Samir (S); Shah, Mrugeshkumar K (MK);

Affiliation: Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Journal: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Arch Phys Med Rehabil), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2004-Mar; vol 85 (issue 3) : pp 474-8

Dates: Created 2004/03/19; Completed 2004/04/08; Revised 2006/11/15;

PMID: 15031836, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.