|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 May 2004): |
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants.
Full Abstract
Two-alternative forced-choice procedures have been the most widely employed for detecting incomplete effort and exaggeration of cognitive impairment. However, it cannot be assumed that different symptom validity tests (SVTs) are of equal sensitivity. In this study, 519 claimants referred for disability or personal injury related assessments were administered three SVTs, one based on digit recognition (Computerized Assessment of Response Bias, CARB), one using pictorial stimuli (Test of Memory Malingering, TOMM) and one employing verbal recognition memory (Word Memory Test, WMT). More than twice as many people failed the WMT than TOMM. CARB failure rates were intermediate between those on the other two tests. Thus, tests of recognition memory using digits, pictorial stimuli or verbal stimuli, all of which are objectively extremely easy tasks, resulted in widely different failure rates. This suggests that, while these tests may be highly specific, they vary substantially in their sensitivity to response bias. Copyright 2003 National Academy of Neuropsychology
Author information
Author/s: Gervais, Roger O (RO); Rohling, Martin L (ML); Green, Paul (P); Ford, Wendy (W);
Affiliation: Neurobehavioural Associates, Suite 201, 17107-107 Avenue, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T5S 1G3. rgervais(-atsign-)shaw.ca
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Controlled Clinical Trial; Journal Article
Journal: Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists (Arch Clin Neuropsychol), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2004-Jun; vol 19 (issue 4) : pp 475-87
Dates: Created 2004/05/27; Completed 2004/11/02; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 15163449, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Effectiveness of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test and the Meyers and Meyers recognition trial in the detection of suspect effort.
30 Jul 2003 - The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): normative data from cognitively intact, cognitively impaired, and elderly patients with dementia.
30 Mar 2004 - Detecting malingered memory deficits with the Recognition Memory Test.
30 Mar 1998 - Clinical utility of Trial 1 of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM).
30 Dec 2007 - Determination of effort level, exaggeration, and malingering in neurocognitive assessment.
29 Apr 2004 - Quantitative measures of memory malingering on the Wechsler Memory Scale--Third edition in mild head injury litigants.
27 Feb 2003 - Hit rates of adequate performance based on the test of memory malingering (TOMM) Trial 1.
30 Dec 2004 - An investigation of the integrity of semantic boundaries in schizophrenia.
13 Jan 2002 - The impact of cognitive and psychiatric impairment of psychotic disorders on the test of memory malingering (TOMM).
30 May 2005 - Detecting simulated memory impairment: further validation of the Word Completion Memory Test (WCMT).
9 Aug 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.