Prediction of tracheostomy tube size for paediatric long-term ventilation: an audit of children with spinal cord injury.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no published data to predict tracheostomy tube size as growth proceeds in children requiring long-term ventilation. METHODS: A retrospective audit was undertaken of children having long-term ventilation, managed from the Southport spinal injuries unit. The dates of step-up in size of tracheostomy tube were noted together with the tube inside and outside diameters (ID and OD) and the lateral tracheal diameter. The data were aggregated for each increment in tube size to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficients for age and weight of the children. Linear regression was then used to generate predictive equations based on age and weight. RESULTS: Out of 12 children, data from seven boys and two girls, with a mean age of 5.9 (range 1.5-13.75) yr, were obtained. Average length of follow-up was 7 yr, with an average of 3.5 tube changes per patient equating to a larger tube every 2 yr. The inside and outside tracheal tube diameters, as well as the lateral tracheal diameter, correlated significantly with age and weight (P<0.01). The appropriate tracheostomy tube internal diameter is conveniently expressed by the formula: ID mm=age yr/3 + 3.5 CONCLUSIONS: The step-up in size of the tracheostomy tube as growth proceeds should be undertaken as a planned procedure at least every 2 yr to avoid nocturnal desaturation. Age appears to be a convenient and reliable predictor.

Author information

Author/s: Behl, S (S); Watt, J W H (JW);

Affiliation: Department of Anaesthesia and Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust, Town Lane, Southport PR8 6PN, UK.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: British journal of anaesthesia (Br J Anaesth), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2005-Jan; vol 94 (issue 1) : pp 88-91

Dates: Created 2004/12/07; Completed 2005/01/18; Revised 2005/01/21;

PMID: 15486000, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.