|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2004): |
A status report on the practice of forensic neuropsychology.
Full Abstract
The practice of forensic neuropsychology has experienced tremendous growth over the past two decades, becoming perhaps the most rapidly expanding area of practice within the field of clinical neuropsychology. Indeed, there have been many important advancements in the field that have helped to position neuropsychologists as instrumental participants within the forensic arena. Yet, there is currently no consensus in our field regarding what constitutes competency in forensic neuropsychology and also no specific guidelines or standards of practice to inform neuropsychologists about how to operate in the forensic arena. There are even fewer safeguards to protect the public from questionable methods of practice. This article provides a status report on the practice of forensic neuropsychology. It employs a framework emphasized by Otto and Heilbrun (2002) in their assessment of the field of forensic psychology. Emphasis is directed toward identifying recent advances in the field and documenting some of the inherent flaws and weaknesses in forensic practice to help advance the practice of forensic neuropsychology toward a more established specialty area.
Author information
Author/s: Heilbronner, Robert L (RL);
Affiliation: Chicago Neuropsychology Group, Chicago, IL 60601, USA. r-heilbronner(-atsign-)northwestern.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
Journal: The Clinical neuropsychologist (Clin Neuropsychol), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2004-May; vol 18 (issue 2) : pp 312-26
Dates: Created 2004/12/13; Completed 2005/02/04; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 15587677, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- [Guidelines for the scientific and professional development of forensic neuropsychology]
29 Jun 2004 - A motion to exclude and the 'fixed' versus 'flexible' battery in 'forensic' neuropsychology: challenges to the practice of clinical neuropsychology.
25 Dec 2006 - Response to Bigler (2007): the sky is not falling.
2 Oct 2007 - Ethical considerations for peer review in forensic neuropsychology.
30 Jan 2002 - Independent and court-ordered forensic neuropsychological examinations: official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology.
30 Jul 2005 - Neuropsychologists diagnose traumatic brain injury.
29 Jun 2004 - Informed consent in clinical neuropsychology practice. Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology.
29 Apr 2005 - Regulations governing the out-of-state practice of psychology: implications for forensic neuropsychologists.
30 Dec 2005 - President's annual state of the academy report.
30 Jan 2006 - Commentary on "A motion to exclude and the 'fixed' versus 'flexible' battery in 'forensic' neuropsychology".
11 Jul 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.