|
|
| Research article summary (published 13 Jun 2005): |
Trauma evaluation and management: who benefits among medical students?
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examines whether or not the ACS ATLS Subcommittee's Trauma Evaluation and Management (TEAM) course is more appropriate for third (Y3) or fourth year (Y4) medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Y3 and Y4 students were divided into control (CTL: 41 Y3, 17 Y4) and experimental (EXP: 39 Y3, 17 Y4) groups. The EXP groups had a 20-item, multiple-choice question exam before, and a similar exam after TEAM. The control CTL group took both exams prior to TEAM. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for statistical comparison with group and year as between subject factors and with P < 0.05 being considered statistically significant. RESULTS: For the Y4 CTL, pretest was 58.8 +/- 10.5% and posttest was 54.4 +/- 11.2%. For the Y3 CTL, pretest was 53.0 +/- 11.8% and posttest was 47.6% +/- 11.4%. For the Y4 EXP, pretest was 59.4% +/- 11.5% and posttest was 69.1 +/- 8.3%. For the Y3 EXP, pretest was 49.2 +/- 11.4% and posttest was 55.0 +/- 10.9%. The difference between experimental and control groups was statistically significant (P = 0.042). The scores for Y4 were higher than Y3 in all groups (P < 0.001). The distribution of scores of Y4 control was nearly identical to Y3 experimental, suggesting that the improvement with TEAM in Y3 was equivalent to the improvement following the traditional curriculum in Y4 without TEAM. CONCLUSIONS: Y3 and Y4 students improved their performance following TEAM, but Y4 students had greater improvement. Y4 students without TEAM achieved scores similar to or greater than students who completed TEAM in Y3. TEAM appears to be more effectively directed to Y4 medical students.
Author information
Author/s: Cherry, Robert A (RA); Ali, Jameel (J); Williams, Jack I (JI);
Affiliation: Departments of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA. rcherry(-atsign-)psu.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
Journal: The Journal of surgical research (J Surg Res), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2005-Jun; vol 126 (issue 2) : pp 189-92
Dates: Created 2005/05/27; Completed 2005/07/13; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 15919418, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Teaching effectiveness of the trauma evaluation and management module for senior medical students.
29 Apr 2002 - [Clinical features and treatment of closed injuries of the kidneys]
29 Jun 1970 - Peripheral nerve injuries.
29 Nov 1970 - Comment on "Diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff tears in the emergency department".
27 Feb 1997 - Thoracic aortic injury.
29 Nov 2000 - [Mesenteric trauma: management in austere environments]
30 Mar 2006 - [Acromioclavicular lesions: diagnosis and treatment]
4 Aug 2008 - Musculoskeletal trauma.
30 Oct 1984 - Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of extremity vascular trauma.
30 Mar 1995 - [Complete anterior cruciate ligament tears in children]
29 Nov 2004
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.