|
|
| Research article summary (published 5 Apr 2005): |
Action modulates object-based selection.
Full Abstract
Cueing attention to one part of an object can facilitate discrimination in another part (Experiment 1 [Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517]; [Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 123, 161-177]). We show that this object-based mediation of attention is disrupted when a pointing movement is prepared to the cued part; when a pointing response is prepared to a part of an object, discrimination does not differ between (i) stimuli at locations in the same object but distant to the part where the pointing movement is programmed and (ii) stimuli at locations equidistant from the movement but outside the object (Experiment 2). This remains true even when the pointing movement cannot be performed without first coding the whole object (Experiment 3). Our results indicate that pointing either (i) emphasizes spatial selection at the expense of object-based selection, or (ii) changes the nature of the representation(s) mediating perceptual selection. In addition, the results indicate that there can be a distinct effect on attention of movement to a specific location, separate from the top-down cueing of attention to another position (Experiment 3). Our data highlight the interactivity between perception and action.
Author information
Author/s: Linnell, Karina J (KJ); Humphreys, Glyn W (GW); McIntyre, Dave B (DB); Laitinen, Sauli (S); Wing, Alan M (AM);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, London SE14 6NW, United Kingdom. k.j.linnell(-atsign-)gold.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Vision research (Vision Res), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2005-Aug; vol 45 (issue 17) : pp 2268-86
Dates: Created 2005/05/31; Completed 2005/08/15; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 15924941, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task.
8 Jan 2008 - Importance of attentional mechanisms in audiovisual links.
29 Apr 1999 - Mental retardation, inspection time, and central attentional impairment.
29 Jun 1984 - Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
28 Jan 2006 - Selection-for-action in visual search.
23 Nov 2004 - The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
29 Sep 2005 - Effects of ambient lighting on visual discrimination, forward masking and attentional facilitation.
15 Oct 2005 - Selective attention, inhibition for repeated events and hemispheric specialization.
30 Oct 2003 - When cross-modal spatial attention fails.
30 Aug 2008 - Hemispheric differences in stop task performance.
27 Feb 2003
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.