|
|
| Research article summary (published 18 Jul 2005): |
Motor preparation in a memorised delay task.
Full Abstract
The effect on reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) of remembering which one of several targets to move to was investigated in 18 participants who completed 416 trials in each task. On each trial, participants moved their index finger from a central, illuminated switch (the stimulus) to one of eight targets located on the circumference of a 6 cm radius circle. A visual cue (illumination of the target) informed the participant of the appropriate target. In the memorised delay task, the cued target was lit for 300 ms followed by a variable (450-750 ms) foreperiod during which the participant was required to remember the location of the target until the stimulus light was extinguished. In the non-memorised delay task, the target remained lit during the entire foreperiod (750-1050 ms) until the response was completed. At the "go" signal (stimulus light extinguished) participants moved as quickly and accurately as possible to the cued target. Both RT and MT were significantly (p<0.05) longer in the memorised delay task. The increase in RT shows that remembering which target imposed a greater load on motor preparation even though all the information needed for preparing the response was presented in the cue at the beginning of each trial. The increase in MT raises the possibility that movement execution was also programmed during motor preparation.
Author information
Author/s: Jordan, Kimberlee (K); Hyland, Brian I (BI); Wickens, Jeffery R (JR); Anson, J Greg (JG);
Affiliation: Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802-3408, USA.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation cérébrale (Exp Brain Res), published in Germany. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2005-Sep; vol 166 (issue 1) : pp 102-8
Dates: Created 2005/10/17; Completed 2006/02/24; Revised 2008/02/15;
PMID: 16032407, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Systematic errors of planar arm movements provide evidence for space categorization effects and interaction of multiple frames of reference.
29 Jun 2001 - Planning short pointing sequences.
15 Jul 2004 - The effect of response-delay on estimating reachability.
30 Oct 2008 - Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with continuous spatial cues.
23 Oct 2003 - Humans trade off viewing time and movement duration to improve visuomotor accuracy in a fast reaching task.
25 Jun 2007 - Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.
5 Nov 2007 - Use of visual information in the correction of interceptive actions.
17 Oct 2006 - Coordination in childhood: modifications of visuomotor representations in 6- to 11-year-old children.
30 May 2001 - Visual information throughout a reach determines endpoint precision.
14 Nov 2006 - Perceptual influences on Fitts' law.
21 Jul 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.