|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Oct 2005): |
Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect.
Full Abstract
A brief flash presented physically aligned with a moving stimulus is perceived to lag behind, a well studied phenomenon termed the Flash-Lag Effect (FLE). It has been recently shown that the FLE also occurs in audition, as well as cross-modally between vision and audition. The present study has two goals: to investigate the acoustic and cross-modal FLE using a random motion technique; and to investigate whether neural latencies may account for the FLE in general. The random motion technique revealed a strong cross-modal FLE for visual motion stimuli and auditory probes, but not for the other conditions. Visual and auditory latencies for stimulus appearance and for motion were measured with three techniques: integration, temporal alignment and reaction times. All three techniques showed that a brief static acoustic stimulus is perceived more rapidly than a brief static visual stimulus, while a sound source in motion is perceived more slowly than a comparable visual stimulus. While the results of these three techniques agreed closely with each other, they were exactly opposite that required to account for the FLE by neural latencies. We conclude that neural latencies do not, in general, explain the flash-lag effect. Rather, our data suggest that neural integration times are more important.
Author information
Author/s: Arrighi, Roberto (R); Alais, David (D); Burr, David (D);
Affiliation: Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Vision research (Vision Res), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2005-Nov; vol 45 (issue 23) : pp 2917-25
Dates: Created 2005/09/19; Completed 2006/02/09;
PMID: 16115662, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.
Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.
Related articles
These are the most related articles currently in our database:
- Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity.
11 Jun 2004 - Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading.
30 Apr 1996 - Two and three dimensional figure reversals [proceedings]
30 Aug 1977 - Conscious access to the unisensory components of a cross-modal illusion.
3 Mar 2007 - Multisensory-mediated auditory localization.
30 Dec 2006 - Brainy mind.
29 Nov 1998 - [Correlation between individual features of the functional asymmetry of the cerebral hemispheres and pilot success]
30 Dec 1981 - Measurements of edge-induced visual contrast and a spatial-frequency interaction of the Cornsweet illusion.
30 May 1977 - Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept.
26 Nov 2005 - Observations on stroboscopic induced motion.
30 Dec 1986
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a larger map of 100+ related articles.