|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2005): |
Programming and reprogramming sequence timing following high and low contextual interference practice.
Full Abstract
Individuals practiced two unique discrete sequence production tasks that differed in their relative time profile in either a blocked or random practice schedule. Each participant was subsequently administered a "precuing" protocol to examine the cost of initially compiling or modifying the plan for an upcoming movement's relative timing. The findings indicated that, in general, random practice facilitated the programming of the required movement timing, and this was accomplished while exhibiting greater accuracy in movement production. Participants exposed to random practice exhibited the greatest motor programming benefit, when a modification to an already prepared movement timing profile was required. When movement timing was only partially constructed prior to the imperative signal, the individuals who were trained in blocked and random practice formats accrued a similar cost to complete the programming process. These data provide additional support for the recent claim of Immink & Wright (2001) that at least some of the benefit from experience in a random as opposed to blocked training context can be localized to superior development and implementation of the motor programming process before executing the movement.
Author information
Author/s: Wright, David L (DL); Magnuson, Curt E (CE); Black, Charles B (CB);
Affiliation: Human Performance Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4243, USA. d-wright(-atsign-)hlkn.tamu.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article
Journal: Research quarterly for exercise and sport (Res Q Exerc Sport), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2005-Sep; vol 76 (issue 3) : pp 258-66
Dates: Created 2005/11/07; Completed 2006/02/28; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 16270703, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: action as a sequence of chunks.
30 May 2003 - Are the elderly able to appropriately reprogram their actions?
30 Mar 2006 - Adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor amplitude transformation with continuous and terminal visual feedback.
30 Aug 2008 - Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning.
30 Mar 2006 - Effect of imagined movement speed on subsequent motor performance.
28 Feb 2008 - Temporal modulations of agonist and antagonist muscle activities accompanying improved performance of ballistic movements.
21 Oct 2007 - Intensive baseball practice improves the Go/Nogo reaction time, but not the simple reaction time.
30 Jan 2005 - Practice-induced changes of brain function during visual attention: a parametric fMRI study at 4 Tesla.
29 Nov 2004 - Task switching effects in anticipation timing.
28 Feb 2008 - Right hemispheric contribution to motor programming of simultaneous bilateral response.
30 May 1999
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.