|
|
| Research article summary (published 27 Feb 2002): |
Ethical and juridical foundations of conscientious objection for health care workers.
Full Abstract
In front of the evolution of medicine and biotechnology, health care workers are called upon to take part within new biomedical practices, that may overcome the limit of acceptability, as it is perceived by their moral conscience. Issues as abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, artificial fertilisation, experimentation on human embryos and prescription of contraceptives and abortifacients call into play the right to conscientious objection of health care personnel, and in some cases, perhaps of physicians and pharmacists too. This recall--already present in many codes of professional conduct and medical ethics--sounds today as a necessity, which asks for a serious deepening of the content, the applicability and the new hypothesis of conscientious objection, in the light of bioethics and law. In particular, the self-determination and often exasperated autonomy of the patient within these practices makes a new principle of professional integrity arise, to protect the physician's conscientious convictions, if the request of the patient or society seem to violate some fundamental human values.
Author information
Author/s: Gambino, Gabriella (G); Spagnolo, Antonio G (AG);
Affiliation: Institute of Bioethics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, School of Medicine, Largo F. Vitto 1, Rome, Italy.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Medicínska etika a bioetika : casopis Ústavu medicínskej etiky a bioetiky = Medical ethics & bioethics : journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics & Bioethics (Med Etika Bioet), published in Slovakia. (Language: eng)
Reference: -2002 Spring-Summer; vol 9 (issue 1-2) : pp 3-5
Dates: Created 2005/11/08; Completed 2006/03/07; Revised 2006/09/04;
PMID: 16276661, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- A medical crisis of conscience: faith drives some to refuse patients medication or care.
14 Jul 2006 - Health workers' choice debated: proposals back right not to treat.
28 Jan 2006 - Protecting the rights of conscience of health care providers.
30 May 1993 - The celestial fire of conscience.
20 Sep 2005 - "Conscience" clauses allow US corporate providers to refuse care.
26 Aug 2004 - Private conscience, public acts.
29 Apr 2007 - When staff object to participating in care.
30 Aug 1995 - The celestial fire of conscience.
20 Sep 2005 - Nontherapeutic quality improvement: The conflict of organizational ethics and societal rule of law.
30 Jan 2007 - Developing the duty to treat: HIV, SARS, and the next epidemic.
30 Dec 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.