|
|
| Research article summary (published 6 Nov 2005): |
Detecting simulation of attention deficits using reaction time tests.
Full Abstract
The current study examined if a newly developed series of reaction time tests, the Computerized Tests of Information Processing (CTIP), were sensitive to simulation of attention deficits commonly caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI). The CTIP consists of three reaction time tests: Simple RT, Choice RT, and Semantic Search RT. These tests were administered to four groups: Control, Simulator, Mild TBI, and Severe TBI. Individuals attempting to simulate attention deficits produced longer reaction time scores, made more incorrect responses, and exhibited greater variability than cognitively-intact individuals and those with TBI. Sensitivity and specificity values were comparable or exceeded those obtained on the Test of Memory Malingering. As such, the CTIP offers considerable promise of serving as a viable malingering test that uses a distinctively different paradigm than the two-item, forced-choice procedure employed by traditional symptom validity tests.
Author information
Author/s: Willison, Janna (J); Tombaugh, Tom N (TN);
Affiliation: Royal Ottawa Hospital, Canada.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Controlled Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists (Arch Clin Neuropsychol), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Jan; vol 21 (issue 1) : pp 41-52
Dates: Created 2005/12/19; Completed 2006/04/11; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 16280230, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain: a comparison of three forced-choice symptom validity tests.
30 Aug 2008 - Malingering indexes for the Halstead Category Test.
29 Apr 2004 - Voluntary stimulus-sensitive jerks and jumps mimicking myoclonus or pathological startle syndromes.
30 Dec 1991 - Neuropsychological test performance of successful brain injury simulators.
29 Nov 2007 - Detecting incomplete effort with Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition.
30 Aug 2006 - How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests.
29 Nov 2002 - The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample.
30 Jul 2006 - Use of the CBDI to detect malingering when malingerers do their "homework".
30 Dec 2002 - Validity indicators within the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: application of new and previously researched multivariate procedures in multiple traumatic brain injury samples.
29 Nov 2002 - Detection of sub-optimal performance using a floor effect strategy in patients with traumatic brain injury.
29 Nov 2004
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.