Research article summary (published 29 Nov 2005):

A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.

Full Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perception of facial attractiveness in profile digital photographs that were incrementally altered to produce different combinations of mandibular anteroposterior positions and lower anterior facial heights. The specific aims were to determine whether there is concordance between providers and consumers in their perceptions of facial attractiveness, and to evaluate whether interactions of the anteroposterior and vertical dimensions and the magnitude of these interactions influence perception of facial attractiveness. METHODS: Profile digital photographs and cephalograms of 3 men and 3 women were used. The position of the jaw was altered incrementally with Dolphin imaging equipment (Dolphin Imaging and Management, Chatsworth, Calif), and booklets were created. One hundred raters (50 laypersons, 25 oral surgeons, 25 orthodontists) scored the profiles on a visual analog scale. All images were duplicated to test intrarater reliability. Factorial ANOVA with repeated measures and the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test for multiple comparisons were used to test for differences in facial attractiveness. The level of significance was set at .05 (P = .05) for all analyses. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was good (ICC = 0.71), and general concordance was found between providers and consumers in their perceptions of facial attractiveness. Interactions of the anteroposterior and vertical dimensions and the magnitude of change in each dimension influence the perception of facial attractiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that preferences of facial attractiveness by laypersons, orthodontists, and oral surgeons in central Ohio are generally in agreement. This information might assist clinicians in treatment planning and making recommendations.

Author information

Author/s: Maple, Jenny R (JR); Vig, Katherine W L (KW); Beck, F Michael (FM); Larsen, Peter E (PE); Shanker, Shiva (S);

Affiliation: College of Dentistry, Ohio State University, 305 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43218, USA.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article

Journal: American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2005-Dec; vol 128 (issue 6) : pp 690-6; quiz 801

Dates: Created 2005/12/19; Completed 2006/01/10; Revised 2006/11/15;

PMID: 16360907, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.

Adolescent Adult Analysis of Variance Beauty Cephalometry Dentists - psychology Esthetics, Dental - psychology Face - anatomy & histology Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Male Malocclusion, Angle Class II - psychology Malocclusion, Angle Class III - psychology Observer Variation Ohio Patients - psychology Perception Photography, Dental - instrumentation Reproducibility of Results Statistics, Nonparametric

Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.

Related articles

These are the most related articles currently in our database:

• The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness. 30 Mar 2005
• Presurgical profile preferences of patients and clinicians. 29 Nov 1998
• A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. 30 May 2005
• Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education. 30 Dec 2007
• Perception of facial esthetics by native Chinese participants by using manipulated digital imagery techniques. 29 Sep 2000
• Perception of the maxillary incisor position with respect to the protrusion of nose and chin. 30 Dec 2006
• Perceptions of dental esthetics of Asian orthodontists and laypersons. 30 Jul 2006
• [Esthetics of face; development of a scale for the measurement of facial esthetics] 30 Jan 1992
• Comparative study of smile analysis by subjective and computerized methods. 30 Oct 2006
• Orthodontic applications of psychological and perceptual studies of facial esthetics. 30 May 1995

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a larger map of 100+ related articles.