|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 2005): |
Recovering articulated pose: a comparison of two pre and postimposed constraint methods.
Full Abstract
We contrast the performance of two methods of imposing constraints during the tracking of articulated objects, the first method preimposing the kinematic constraints during tracking and, thus, using the minimum degrees of freedom, and the second imposing constraints after tracking and, hence, using the maximum. Despite their very different formulations, the methods recover the same pose change. Further comparisons are drawn in terms of computational speed and algorithmic simplicity and robustness, and it is the last area which is the most telling. The results suggest that using built-in constraints is well-suited to tracking individual articulated objects, whereas applying constraints afterward is most suited to problems involving contact and breakage between articulated (or rigid) objects, where the ability to test tracking performance quickly with constraints turned on or off is desirable.
Author information
Author/s: de Campos, Teofilo E (TE); Tordoff, Ben J (BJ); Murray, David W (DW);
Affiliation: Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK. teo(-atsign-)robots.ox.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence (IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Jan; vol 28 (issue 1) : pp 163-8
Dates: Created 2006/01/11; Completed 2006/02/01; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 16402630, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.
Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.
Related articles
These are the most related articles currently in our database:
- A field model for human detection and tracking.
29 Apr 2006 - Recovering 3D human pose from monocular images.
30 Dec 2005 - Articulated pose identification with sparse point features.
30 May 2004 - Motion analysis of articulated objects from monocular images.
30 Mar 2006 - Pose estimation for augmented reality applications using genetic algorithm.
29 Nov 2005 - Recovering 3D human body configurations using shape contexts.
29 Jun 2006 - Real-time decentralized articulated motion analysis and object tracking from videos.
30 Jul 2007 - A model-based approach for estimating human 3D poses in static images.
30 May 2006 - Individual recognition using gait energy image.
30 Jan 2006 - Estimation of the centre of rotation: a methodological contribution.
28 Feb 2004
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a larger map of 100+ related articles.