Duplex scan surveillance of infra-inguinal bypass grafts: the case for selectivity.

Full Abstract

A consecutive series of 270 non-reversed infra-inguinal saphenous vein bypass grafts performed by the same surgeon between January 1986 and January 1991 was reviewed. The series included 250 in situ and 20 translocated non-reversed grafts. The aims were to calculate the number of duplex scans that would have been required for surveillance, to determine the value of a non-selective prolonged scanning regimen and to identify subgroups requiring more (or less) intensive surveillance. Indications were for critical ischaemia in 194 patients, popliteal aneurysms in seven patients and incapacitating claudication in 69 patients. Patients were reviewed at 1 month and then at approximate 6 month intervals for symptoms and with resting and post-exercise ankle pressures. Primary patency of grafts placed to a popliteal distal anastomosis for critical ischaemia was 85% (s.e.m. 9.1%) at 3 years while secondary patency was 94% (s.e.m. 8.1%) at 4 years. Primary patency of grafts placed to a tibial artery or isolated popliteal segment was 68% (s.e.m. 8.4%) at 2 years while secondary patency was 76% (s.e.m. 9.9%) at 2.5 years. The difference in secondary patency between popliteal and tibial grafts was highly significant (P = 0.003). Tibial grafts required significantly more secondary early intervention than popliteal grafts. If recommended protocols for serial duplex scan (DS) surveillance had been followed, a minimum of 960 scans would have been required. If the tibial bypass group only had been monitored, 702 of these scans would have been avoided with a maximum loss of one popliteal graft and no limbs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Author information

Author/s: Bourke, B M (BM);

Affiliation: Department of Surgery, Gosford District Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery (Aust N Z J Surg), published in AUSTRALIA. (Language: eng)

Reference: 1992-Aug; vol 62 (issue 8) : pp 611-7

Dates: Created 1992/09/02; Completed 1992/09/02; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 1642581, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: Aust N Z J Surg. 1993 Jan;63(1):80-1. (PMID: 8507279)

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.