Caring for diverse populations: do academic family medicine practices have CLAS?

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND

AND OBJECTIVES:
The Future of Family Medicine Final Report calls for greater emphasis on training physicians to provide culturally proficient and effective quality care to an increasingly diverse population. It remains unclear, however, how prepared academic family medicine practices are to address this need.

METHODS:
We carried out a qualitative sub-study (as part of a larger research study) using depth and focus group interviews at two urban family medicine centers to understand the challenges and opportunities involved in meeting the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health's National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) in Health Care. The Lewin Group's Organizational Cultural Competence Assessment Profile was used to analyze the qualitative interview data.

RESULTS:
The main themes that emerged from interviews with faculty physicians, administrators, staff, and patients were:
(1) the need for more linguistically appropriate services, (2) lack of communication among those involved in care delivery, and (3) interest in education about cultural and linguistic competence.

CONCLUSIONS:
The academic family medicine practices studied are frustrated and challenged to integrate cultural and linguistic competence into patient care. Organizational pressures, multiple competing demands, and resource constraints inhibit preparedness to address the CLAS standards and important new national requirements and guidelines.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Kairys, Jo Ann (JA); Like, Robert C (RC);

Affiliation: Center for Healthy Families and Cultural Diversity, Department of Family Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, USA. jkairys(-atsign-)comcast.net

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Family medicine (Fam Med), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2006-Mar; vol 38 (issue 3) : pp 196-205

Dates: Created 2006/03/06; Completed 2006/07/11; Revised 2007/11/15;

PMID: 16518738, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

Practical idealism: a blueprint for caring. 30 May 2000
Modernising medical careers: is it good for patients? 30 Jul 2005
Practice facilitators: a review of the literature. 30 Aug 2005
What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings? 5 Aug 2006
Treatment reviews of older people on polypharmacy in primary care: cluster controlled trial comparing two approaches. 30 Aug 2007
Improving diabetes care in my practice. 30 Oct 2007
Casting stones. 30 Jul 2008
Understanding the audition. 30 Jul 2008
Developing meaningful age-appropriate competencies for clinical services. 30 Oct 1999
Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. 21 Mar 2002

See 100+ related articles.