|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 May 2006): |
A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information.
Full Abstract
Adequate functional literacy skills positively influence individuals' ability to take control of their health. Print and Web-based cancer information is often written at difficult reading levels. This systematic review evaluates readability instruments (FRE, F-K, Fog, SMOG, Fry) used to assess print and Web-based cancer information and word recognition and comprehension tests (Cloze, REALM, TOFHLA, WRAT) that measure people's health literacy. Articles on readability and comprehension instruments explicitly used for cancer information were assembled by searching MEDLINE and Psyc INFO from 1993 to 2003. In all, 23 studies were included; 16 on readability, 6 on comprehension, and 1 on readability and comprehension. Of the readability investigations, 14 focused on print materials, and 2 assessed Internet information. Comprehension and word recognition measures were not applied to Web-based information. None of the formulas were designed to determine the effects of visuals or design factors that could influence readability and comprehension of cancer education information.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Friedman, Daniela B (DB); Hoffman-Goetz, Laurie (L);
Affiliation: Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review
Journal: Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (Health Educ Behav), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Jun; vol 33 (issue 3) : pp 352-73
Dates: Created 2006/05/15; Completed 2006/10/12; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 16699125, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art.
29 Nov 2001 - Doctors, patients and the Internet: time to grasp the nettle.
27 Feb 2002 - Information technology looms large in the present and future of health care.
30 Mar 2002 - eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites.
29 Nov 2002 - [Evaluation of Spanish websites useful for the primary care physicians]
29 May 2003 - E-medicine and health care consumers: recognizing current problems and possible resolutions for a safer environment.
30 Dec 2001 - The evolution of Web-based medical information on sore throat: a longitudinal study.
30 Mar 2003 - Setting the public agenda for online health search: a white paper and action agenda.
6 Jun 2004 - Efficacy of quality criteria to identify potentially harmful information: a cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine web sites.
27 Jun 2004 - Take the high road: build trust on the health Internet.
30 Dec 2001
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.