A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students' critical thinking.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Educational approaches are thought to have facilitative or hindering effects on students' critical thinking development. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecturing approaches on the development of students' critical thinking.

METHODS:
All 79 Year 1 undergraduate nursing students at a university in Hong Kong were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 parallel courses delivered by either PBL (n = 40) or lecturing (n = 39) over 1 academic year. The primary outcome measure was students' critical thinking disposition as measured by the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI). Individual interviews were also conducted to elicit the students' perceptions of their learning experience. Data were collected at 4 timepoints spanning 3 years.

RESULTS:
The overall CCTDI and subscale scores for the PBL group were not significantly different from those of the lecture group at the first timepoint (pretest). Compared with lecture students, PBL students showed significantly greater improvement in overall CCTDI (P = 0.0048), Truthseeking (P = 0.0008), Analyticity (P = 0.0368) and Critical Thinking Self-confidence (P = 0.0342) subscale scores from the first to the second timepoints; in overall CCTDI (P = 0.0083), Truthseeking (P = 0.0090) and Analyticity (P = 0.0354) subscale scores from the first to the third timepoints; and in Truthseeking (P = 0.0173) and Systematicity (P = 0.0440) subscale scores from the first to the fourth timepoints.

CONCLUSIONS:
There were significant differences in the development of students' critical thinking dispositions between those who undertook the PBL and lecture courses, respectively.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Tiwari, Agnes (A); Lai, Patrick (P); So, Mike (M); Yuen, Kwan (K);

Affiliation: Department of Nursing Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. afytiwar(-atsign-)hkucc.hku.hk

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Medical education (Med Educ), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2006-Jun; vol 40 (issue 6) : pp 547-54

Dates: Created 2006/05/16; Completed 2006/10/30; Revised 2006/11/15;

PMID: 16700770, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: Med Educ. 2006 Sep;40(9):932. (PMID: 16925646)

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Adult
California
Clinical Competence - standards
Decision Making
Education, Nursing - methods

Education, Nursing - methods
Hong Kong
Humans
Problem-Based Learning - methods
Students, Nursing - psychology

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.