The quality of parental consent for research with children: a prospective repeated measure self-report survey.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Researchers have ethical and legal responsibilities to ensure that individuals give informed consent to participate in research. The few studies of parental consent for paediatric research suggest there may be inadequate competence, information, understanding, or voluntariness for valid consent to occur.

OBJECTIVES:
To determine parents' level of understanding of the research study requirements and satisfaction with the informed consent process.

PARTICIPANTS:
English literate parents of children actively involved in research studies.

METHODS:
A repeated measures self-report survey was conducted to measure parent understanding (actual and perceived) of the study consented for and satisfaction with the informed consent process. Relationships between parents understanding of the research and their satisfaction with the consent process were explored and changes in parent understanding or satisfaction over time were described.

RESULTS:
Questionnaires from 109 parents were returned, representing 25 different studies. Parents demonstrated a high level of knowledge of information essential for informed consent, such as the purpose, benefits, and participant rights. Nervousness or inability to concentrate, and reading ease of the information sheet were found to relate to parents' knowledge and their perceptions of the adequacy of the consent. Parents overall reported high satisfaction with the consent process.

CONCLUSIONS:
These findings support and extend previous research on parental consent for research with children. They suggest areas where further research is indicated, including:
the value and use of information and consent documents given to parents, the views and concerns of parents for whom English is not their first language, and further exploration of the concerns of the few dissatisfied parents. Current practices of obtaining informed consent for research lack supporting research evidence and may not be ethically justifiable.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Franck, Linda S (LS); Winter, Ira (I); Oulton, Kate (K);

Affiliation: lnstitute of Child Health, London, UK. l.franck(-atsign-)ich.ucl.ac.uk

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: International journal of nursing studies (Int J Nurs Stud), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-May; vol 44 (issue 4) : pp 525-33

Dates: Created 2007/04/20; Completed 2007/06/21;

PMID: 16712850, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Adolescent
Adult
Anxiety - psychology
Attitude to Health
Child
Child Advocacy - education; psychology
Comprehension
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Status
Hospitals, Pediatric
Human Experimentation

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.