|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jan 2007): |
Overriding psychiatric advance directives: factors associated with psychiatrists' decisions to preempt patients' advance refusal of hospitalization and medication.
Full Abstract
Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are intended to support patients' treatment decisions during a crisis. However, PAD statutes give clinicians broad discretion over whether to carry out patients' advance instructions. This study uses data from a survey of psychiatrists (N=164) to examine reasons for overriding PADs. In response to a hypothetical vignette, 47% of psychiatrists indicated that they would override a valid, competently-executed PAD that refused hospitalization and medication. PAD override was more likely among psychiatrists who worked in hospital emergency departments; those who were concerned about patients' violence risk and lack of insight; and those who were legally defensive. PAD override was less likely among participants who believed that involuntary treatment is largely unnecessary in a high-quality mental health system.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Swanson, Jeffrey W (JW); Van McCrary, S (S); Swartz, Marvin S (MS); Van Dorn, Richard A (RA); Elbogen, Eric B (EB);
Affiliation: Services Effectiveness Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3071, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. jeffrey.swanson(-atsign-)duke.edu
Grants: K02-MH67864 (Agency:NIMH NIH HHS)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Law and human behavior (Law Hum Behav), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2007-Feb; vol 31 (issue 1) : pp 77-90
Dates: Created 2007/02/23; Completed 2007/06/20; Revised 2007/12/03;
PMID: 16718578, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Safety and compliance with an emergency medical service direct psychiatric center transport protocol.
30 Aug 2008 - Should ethics consultants help clinicians face scarcity in their practice?
30 Mar 2008 - Ethically problematic treatment decisions in different medical specialties.
30 Mar 2008 - Use of psychiatric advance directives during psychiatric crisis events.
29 Jun 2008 - Roles and responsibilities of health care agents: views of patients and agents.
30 May 2008 - Increases in Medicare prescription drug plan costs attributable to psychotropic medications.
30 Jul 2008 - Patients' preferences for receiving clinical information and participating in decision-making in Iran.
29 Apr 2008 - Learning a way through ethical problems: Swedish nurses' and doctors' experiences from one model of ethics rounds.
29 Apr 2008 - How do older patients and their GPs evaluate shared decision-making in healthcare?
29 Apr 2008 - Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: do physicians agree about the importance of patient age and comorbidity?
18 May 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.