Measuring mobility performance: experience gained in designing a mobility course.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
This paper reviews the most common methods of measuring and scoring orientation and mobility (O and M) and the effects of visual impairment on O and M. We discuss the difficulties inherent in designing a 'real-world' course to measure O and M and we describe the course that we finally used.

METHODS:
Thirty-five participants in two age groups, with low vision due to a variety of disorders, took part in mobility trials on the final version of the course. Aspects of visual function were measured.

RESULTS:
Factor analysis indicated that mobility errors, visual detection distance and visual identification distance were grouped with measures of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and Humphrey visual field mean deviation, while preferred walking speed and walking speed were separately grouped. Humphrey pattern standard deviation did not group with any other measure and neither did percentage preferred walking speed. This study is in agreement with other studies that visual field and contrast sensitivity, sometimes with low contrast visual acuity, were the best clinical visual predictors of mobility performance. Based on our experiences we present a number of recommendations for designing courses for assessing mobility.

CONCLUSIONS:
For future studies, it would behove researchers to include a range of mobility measures, until further understanding is gained about how they are interrelated and contribute information on the relationship among mobility, vision and other individual factors.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Leat, Susan J (SJ); Lovie-Kitchin, Jan E (JE);

Affiliation: School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. leat(-atsign-)uwaterloo.ca

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review

Journal: Clinical & experimental optometry : journal of the Australian Optometrical Association (Clin Exp Optom), published in Australia. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2006-Jul; vol 89 (issue 4) : pp 215-28

Dates: Created 2006/06/16; Completed 2006/09/01; Revised 2006/11/15;

PMID: 16776729, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
Humans
Orientation - physiology
Perimetry

Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Vision Disorders - physiopathology
Visual Fields - physiology
Walking - physiology

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.