|
|
| Research article summary (published 13 Jul 2006): |
Pushing and pulling: personal mechanics influence spine loads.
Full Abstract
This study assessed several mechanical issues related to low back loading during pushing and/or pulling tasks. Nine male participants performed two-handed pushing and pulling tasks at two handle heights with three loads, using a cable pulley system. Four of these men were professional firefighters trained in performing pushing and pulling tasks while the other five were graduate students who lacked manual work experience. The more experienced firefighters produced less spinal compression and shearing forces when compared to the less experienced students under the same conditions. The firefighters were able to create less muscle activation as compared to the students, which indicated a more efficient technique. The main contributing factors to the forces produced on the low back were the quantity of the load being pushed or pulled, handle height, experience level and the technique of the participant. Thus, attempts to set load limits for pushing and pulling tasks are difficult, since technique has such a large influence on back loading. In order to create safer working environments, education on proper pushing and pulling techniques is very important--more important than the physical variables in many cases.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Lett, Kelly K (KK); McGill, Stuart M (SM);
Affiliation: Spine Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Ergonomics (Ergonomics), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Jul; vol 49 (issue 9) : pp 895-908
Dates: Created 2006/06/27; Completed 2006/09/12; Revised 2008/11/21;
PMID: 16801235, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Biomechanical assessment of the pediatric cervical spine under bending and tensile loading.
13 Dec 2005 - Increase in spinal stability obtained at levels of intra-abdominal pressure and back muscle activity realistic to work situations.
30 Aug 2002 - The effect of compressive axial preload on the flexibility of the thoracolumbar spine.
29 Apr 2004 - Biomechanical evaluation of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement under cyclic loading.
29 Nov 2006 - Neuromuscular trunk performance and spinal loading during a fatiguing isometric trunk extension with varying torque requirements.
30 Mar 1997 - Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions.
29 Jun 1997 - Changes in trunk dynamics and spine loading during repeated trunk exertions.
30 Oct 1997 - Effect of handle design for cylinder trolleys.
29 Sep 1999 - Trabecular shear stress in human vertebral cancellous bone: intra- and inter-individual variations.
29 Sep 2001 - Subject-specific compressive tolerance estimates.
30 Dec 2002
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.