|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jul 2006): |
Active masks and active inhibition: a comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004).
Full Abstract
Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen and Lleras and Enns have argued that negative compatibility effects (NCEs) obtained with masked primes do not reflect self-inhibition processes in motor control. Instead, NCEs are assumed to reflect activation of the response opposite to the prime, triggered by the presence of prime/targetlike features in the mask. Thus, no NCEs should be elicited when masks do not contain such task-relevant features. In Experiments 1 and 3, the authors demonstrate that NCEs can be obtained when masks contain only irrelevant features. Experiment 2 demonstrates that positive compatibility effects (PCEs) will occur with such masks when masked primes are presented peripherally. These results are inconsistent with the mask-induced activation accounts but are in line with the self-inhibition hypothesis of the NCE. Although perceptual interactions and mask-induced motor activations may contribute to NCEs under certain conditions, they cannot provide a full explanation for these effects.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Schlaghecken, Friederike (F); Eimer, Martin (M);
Affiliation: Department of PsychologyUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, England. f.schlaghecken(-atsign-)warwick.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comment; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Journal of experimental psychology. General (J Exp Psychol Gen), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Aug; vol 135 (issue 3) : pp 484-94
Dates: Created 2006/07/18; Completed 2006/12/15;
PMID: 16846277, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
Comments and Corrections
CommentOn: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Dec;133(4):475-93. (PMID: 15584802)
CommentOn: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Dec;133(4):494-515. (PMID: 15584803)
CommentIn: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Aug;135(3):495-500. (PMID: 16846278)
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Grasp cueing shows obligatory attention to action goals.
30 May 2008 - Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
12 Feb 2008 - Attentional effects of gaze shifts are influenced by emotion and spatial frequency, but not in autism.
30 Mar 2008 - Primary visual cortex reflects behavioral performance in the attentional blink.
25 Aug 2008 - ERP correlates of anticipatory attention: spatial and non-spatial specificity and relation to subsequent selective attention.
16 Mar 2008 - Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
11 Feb 2008 - Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
11 Apr 2008 - The "diagonal effect": a systematic error in oblique antisaccades.
19 May 2008 - Visual hemispatial neglect, re-assessed.
28 Feb 2008 - Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction.
3 Mar 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.