Clinical competence: general ability or case-specific?

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Before the 1970s, research into the development of clinical competence was mainly focused on general problem-solving abilities. The scope of research changed when Elstein and colleagues discovered that individual ability to solve clinical problems varies considerably across cases. It was concluded that problem solving abilities are highly dependent on domain-specific knowledge rather than on general problem solving skills. Elstein called this phenomenon "case specificity."

PURPOSE:
The finding of content specificity will be contrasted with the existence of a general clinical problem solving ability, and the relationship between preclinical knowledge and a problem solving ability will be investigated.

METHODS:
A correlation matrix was calculated with clerkship final scores from 10 disciplines to examine the magnitude of the interrelations. A confirmatory factor analysis was applied to the corresponding covariances using structural equation modeling to investigate whether scores on finals shared any common variance across clerkships. Finally, two additional models were tested to examine the nature of the relationship between preclinical knowledge and problem solving.

RESULTS:
Low to moderate correlations across clerkship disciplines were found, supporting the original findings of content specificity. Further investigation showed that in addition to specific knowledge, a general, content-independent ability is needed to perform on these examinations.

CONCLUSIONS:
Clinical competence, as measured in this study, is based on a combination of specific preclinical knowledge and a problem-solving ability. Case specificity fits perfectly well in this interactional perspective on clinical problem solving but does not explain it. The phenomenon "case specificity" is therefore not solely a result of content knowledge, but of level of experience and level of case difficulty.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Wimmers, Paul F (PF); Splinter, Ted A W (TA); Hancock, Gregory R (GR); Schmidt, Henk G (HG);

Affiliation: Institute of Medical Education and Research, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. pwimmers(-atsign-)medschool.pitt.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice (Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Aug; vol 12 (issue 3) : pp 299-314

Dates: Created 2007/12/06; Completed 2008/02/12;

PMID: 16847735, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Clinical Clerkship - organization & administration; standards
Clinical Competence - standards
Educational Measurement - methods
Humans
Models, Educational
Netherlands

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.