|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jul 2006): |
Understanding the motivational effects of procedural and informational justice in feedback processes.
Full Abstract
Building upon traditional feedback models, this study examined the role of fair treatment in feedback contexts. Structural equation modelling using data from 236 undergraduate students highlighted perceived accuracy as a mediator in the credibility-motivation relationship as well as a relationship between accuracy and perceptions of procedural and informational justice. In addition, the results showed that the motivating effects of feedback accuracy partially occurred through procedural justice perceptions. Tests of an alternative model also demonstrated the interactive effects of credibility and accuracy on justice perceptions. Overall, this study provides insight into the role of fairness in appraisal processes, as well as how fairness might enhance recipients' reactions to appraisal and, subsequently, the effectiveness of appraisal systems.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Roberson, Quinetta M (QM); Stewart, Marcus M (MM);
Affiliation: Human Resource Studies, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, 393 Ives Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. qmr3(-atsign-)cornell.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) (Br J Psychol), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Aug; vol 97 (issue Pt 3) : pp 281-98
Dates: Created 2006/07/19; Completed 2006/12/22;
PMID: 16848943, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Influence of prior involvement on employees' ratings.
30 Jan 2002 - Influence of performance evaluation rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions.
29 Nov 2001 - Development of competency inventory for registered nurses in the People's Republic of China: scale development.
5 Mar 2006 - Body mass penalties in the physical fitness tests of the Army, Air Force, and Navy.
30 Jul 2006 - Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity.
30 Mar 2001 - Effects of the video case study in preparing paramedic preceptors for the role of evaluator.
30 Mar 2001 - Illuminative evaluation: evaluating clinical supervision on its performance rather than the applause.
30 Aug 2001 - The role of performance indicators in changing the autonomy of the general practice profession in the UK.
30 Mar 2003 - Correcting for compensating mechanisms related to productivity costs in economic evaluations of health care programmes.
29 Apr 2005 - Distinguishing between task and contextual performance for nurses: development of a job performance scale.
15 Apr 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.