|
|
| Research article summary (published 7 Aug 2006): |
The effect of response uncertainty on illusory biases of perception and action.
Full Abstract
When task requirements were known in advance, Glazebrook et al. [C.M. Glazebrook, V.P. Dhillon, K.M. Keetch, J. Lyons, E. Amazeen, D.J. Weeks, D. Elliott, Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion:
amplitude or endpoint bias?, Exp. Brain Res. 160 (2005) 71-78.] demonstrated that perceptual biases associated with the Müller-Lyer illusion resulted from a misperception of figure extent, while manual aiming biases resulted from a misperception of vertex position. In this study, we examined the degree to which prior knowledge of task requirements influenced how participants coded visual-spatial information associated with Müller-Lyer configurations. Specifically, we investigated how illusory biases are affected when uncertainty exists as to whether participants will be required to make a perceptual-cognitive decision about the length of a figure or complete a rapid aiming movement to a figure vertex. Although aiming movements were completed in a similar manner regardless of the prior knowledge condition, perceptual biases were associated with a misperception of extent when the task was known and a misperception of both extent and position when the task was unknown. These findings indicate that people are flexible in the manner in which they code visual-spatial information.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Keetch, Katherine M (KM); Glazebrook, Cheryl M (CM); Lyons, James (J); Lam, Melanie Y (MY); Weeks, Daniel J (DJ); Elliott, Digby (D);
Affiliation: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., L8S 4K1 Canada. keetchkm(-atsign-)mcmaster.ca
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Neuroscience letters (Neurosci Lett), published in Ireland. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Oct; vol 406 (issue 1-2) : pp 117-21
Dates: Created 2006/08/28; Completed 2006/11/03; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 16901634, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.
14 Nov 2005 - On the relations between affordance and representation of the agent's effector.
30 Jan 2007 - Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions.
30 Mar 1999 - Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?
30 Dec 2004 - The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion.
21 May 2006 - Eye-hand coordination asymmetries in manual aiming.
30 Dec 2006 - The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.
30 Dec 1997 - How sensitive is hand transport to illusory context effects?
30 Dec 2000 - Visuomanual coordination in childhood: adaptation to visual distortion.
18 Mar 2002 - Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion.
24 Sep 2003
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.