|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2006): |
Are prosocials unique in their egalitarianism? The pursuit of equality in outcomes among individualists.
Full Abstract
The present research aims to elucidate to what extent the motive to ensure equality in outcomes is general and to what extent it interacts with other important motives such as maximizing own or collective gains. Because individuals may have different considerations and motivations in decision-making situations, it is likely that people with a different social value orientation will respond differently to an unequal distribution of outcomes. Contrary to expectations, not only prosocials care about equality in outcomes. In Study 1, the authors found that individualists choose to forego personal gains, despite obvious selfish reasons to cooperate, when outcomes were distributed unequally. In a second experiment, this finding was replicated and shows that individualists, just as prosocials, demand equality in outcomes in interdependent situations. The studies suggest that typifying individualists as solely being concerned about enhancing personal outcomes is too limited and that fairness norms may trump social value orientation.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Van den Bergh, Bram (B); Dewitte, Siegfried (S); De Cremer, David (D);
Affiliation: KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium. bram.vandenbergh(-atsign-)econ.kuleuven.be
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Personality and social psychology bulletin (Pers Soc Psychol Bull), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Sep; vol 32 (issue 9) : pp 1219-31
Dates: Created 2006/08/11; Completed 2007/01/09;
PMID: 16902241, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Which type of leader do I support in step-level public good dilemmas? The roles of level of threshold and trust.
30 Jan 2007 - Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the domain of correspondent outcomes: the roles of relativistic concern, perceived categorization, and the doctrine of mutual assured destruction.
28 Feb 2008 - Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior.
30 May 2008 - Retrospection in social dilemmas: how thinking about the past affects future cooperation.
29 Apr 2003 - Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes.
11 Nov 2006 - Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment.
31 Dec 2006 - Postdecisional counterfactual thinking by actors and readers.
30 May 2007 - Ambiguous games: evidence for strategic ambiguity aversion.
30 Jul 2007 - Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making.
30 Oct 2004 - Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies.
30 Aug 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.