|
|
| Research article summary (published 13 Aug 2006): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Most physicians and hospitals are paid the same regardless of the quality of the health care they provide. This produces no financial incentives and, in some cases, produces disincentives for quality. Increasing numbers of programs link payment to performance.
PURPOSE:
To systematically review studies assessing the effect of explicit financial incentives for improved performance on measures of health care quality.
DATA SOURCES:
PubMed search of English-language literature (1 January 1980 to 14 November 2005), and reference lists of retrieved articles.
STUDY SELECTION:
Empirical studies of the relationship between explicit financial incentives designed to improve health care quality and a quantitative measure of health care quality.
DATA EXTRACTION:
The authors categorized studies according to the level of the incentive (individual physician, provider group, or health care payment system) and the type of quality measure rewarded.
DATA SYNTHESIS:
Thirteen of 17 studies examined process-of-care quality measures, most of which were for preventive services. Five of the 6 studies of physician-level financial incentives and 7 of the 9 studies of provider group-level financial incentives found partial or positive effects on measures of quality. One of the 2 studies of incentives at the payment-system level found a positive effect on access to care, and 1 showed evidence of a negative effect on access to care for the sickest patients. In all, 4 studies suggested unintended effects of incentives. The authors found no studies examining the optimal duration of financial incentives for quality or the persistence of their effects after termination. Only 1 study addressed cost-effectiveness.
LIMITATIONS:
Few empirical studies of explicit financial incentives for quality were available for review.
CONCLUSIONS:
Ongoing monitoring of incentive programs is critical to determine the effectiveness of financial incentives and their possible unintended effects on quality of care. Further research is needed to guide implementation of financial incentives and to assess their cost-effectiveness.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Petersen, Laura A (LA); Woodard, LeChauncy D (LD); Urech, Tracy (T); Daw, Christina (C); Sookanan, Supicha (S);
Affiliation: Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. laurap(-atsign-)bcm.edu
Grants: R01 HL079173-01 (Agency:NHLBI NIH HHS)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.; Review
Journal: Annals of internal medicine (Ann Intern Med), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Aug; vol 145 (issue 4) : pp 265-72
Dates: Created 2006/08/15; Completed 2006/08/16; Revised 2007/11/14;
PMID: 16908917, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
Comments and Corrections
CommentIn: Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):538; author reply 538-9. (PMID: 17404361)
CommentIn: Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):313; author reply 313-4. (PMID: 17310059)
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Pay for performance (P4P).
30 Dec 2007 - Can money buy quality? Physician response to pay for performance.
29 Nov 2005 - Getting real performance out of pay-for-performance.
30 Aug 2008 - Audio interview: pay for performance--recommendations of the Institute of Medicine, with Dr. Elliott S. Fisher and Dr. Karen Davis interviewed by Rachel Gotbaum.
19 Sep 2006 - Is P4P really FFS?
15 Oct 2007 - Can pay-for-performance improve quality and reduce health disparities?
30 May 2007 - There's no gain in gain-sharing. Savings on surgical devices pale in comparison to benefits of advanced procedures.
12 Aug 2006 - Pay for performance for the allergist-immunologist: potential promise and problems.
4 Aug 2007 - Pay for performance (P4P) in medical imaging: the time has (finally) come.
29 Nov 2006 - Paying physicians for high-quality care.
27 Apr 2004
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.