Effectiveness of clinician-selected electronic information resources for answering primary care physicians' information needs.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE:
To determine if clinician-selected electronic information resources improve primary care physicians' abilities to answer simulated clinical questions.

DESIGN:
Observational study using hour-long interviews in physician offices and think-aloud protocols.

PARTICIPANTS:
answered 23 multiple-choice questions and chose 2 to obtain further information using their own information resources. We established which resources physicians chose, processes used, and results obtained when looking for information to support their answers.

MEASUREMENTS:
Correctness of answers before and after searching, resources used, and searching techniques.

RESULTS:
23 physicians sought answers to 46 questions using their own information resources. They spent a mean of 13.0 (SD 5.5) minutes searching for information for the two questions using an average of 1.8 resources per question and a wide variety of searching techniques. On average 43.5% of the answers to the original 23 questions were correct. For the questions that were searched, 18 (39.1%) of the 46 answers were correct before searching. After searching, the number of correct answers was 19 (42.1%). This difference of 1 correct answer was attributed to 6 questions (13.0%) going from an incorrect to correct answer and 5 (10.9%) questions going from a correct to incorrect answer. We found differences in the ability of various resources to provide correct answers.

CONCLUSION:
For the primary care physicians studied, electronic information resources of choice did not always provide support for finding correct answers to simulated clinical questions and in some instances, individual resources may have contributed to an initially correct answer becoming incorrect.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: McKibbon, K Ann (KA); Fridsma, Douglas B (DB);

Affiliation: Health Information Research Unit, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. mckib(-atsign-)mcmaster.ca

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA (J Am Med Inform Assoc), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: -2006 Nov-Dec; vol 13 (issue 6) : pp 653-9

Dates: Created 2006/11/20; Completed 2007/01/04; Revised 2008/11/20;

PMID: 16929042, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.