|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2006): |
Response rate or time to progression as predictors of survival in trials of metastatic colorectal cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The duration and cost of cancer clinical trials could be reduced if a surrogate endpoint were used in place of survival. We did a meta-analysis to assess the extent to which two surrogates, tumour response and time to progression, are predictive of mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer.
METHODS:
Summary data (median time to progression, proportion of patients responding to treatment, and median overall survival) from randomised trials of first-line treatment in colorectal cancer (146 trials) and lung cancer (191 trials) were identified. Data were extracted and analysed by linear regression. We used prediction bands for trials with 250, 500, and 750 patients to identify the surrogate threshold effect that would predict a significant difference in survival.
FINDINGS:
Response to treatment and time to progression correlated with improvement in survival for both lung cancer (p<0.0001 and p=0.0003, respectively) and colorectal cancer (p<0.0001 for both). To predict a significant survival gain in colorectal cancer trials, an improvement of 20% in the number of patients responding to treatment was required in trials with 750 patients, increasing to 26% in trials with 500 patients and 38% in trials with 250 patients. In lung cancer trials, the same prediction required differences in response of 18% for 750 patients, 21% for 500 patients, and 30% for 250 patients. For time to progression for both cancer types, the incremental gain needed to predict a survival improvement was a median of 1.8 months for trials with 750 patients, 2.2 months for 500 patients, and 3.3 months for 250 patients.
INTERPRETATION:
Irrespective of trial size, large differences in tumour response rate are needed to predict a significant survival benefit. If surrogates are chosen as the primary endpoint in a clinical trial, time to progression is the preferred measure because more modest and achievable differences are needed for a significant survival benefit. Trials in metastatic lung cancer and colorectal cancer should measure survival as their primary outcome unless the surrogate outcome difference is anticipated to exceed the threshold effect size.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Johnson, Kent R (KR); Ringland, Clare (C); Stokes, Barrie J (BJ); Anthony, Danielle M (DM); Freemantle, Nick (N); Irs, Alar (A); Hill, Suzanne R (SR); Ward, Robyn L (RL);
Affiliation: Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: The lancet oncology (Lancet Oncol), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Sep; vol 7 (issue 9) : pp 741-6
Dates: Created 2006/09/01; Completed 2006/10/10; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 16945769, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
Comments and Corrections
CommentIn: Lancet Oncol. 2006 Sep;7(9):703-4. (PMID: 16945763)
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- [Non-small cell lung cancer - diagnostics and stage-adapted therapy]
13 Dec 2007 - [From ASCO and WCLC 2005 to clinical practice: "conventional" treatments]
30 Jan 2006 - [Oral vinorelbine: pharmacology and treatment outcome in non-small cell bronchial carcinoma and breast carcinoma]
Mar 2006 - [Can positron-emission tomography modify the management of non-small-cell lung cancer?]
30 Jan 2006 - [Current data concerning neoadjuvant chemotherapy]
30 Jan 2006 - Predictive value of D-dimer plasma levels in response and progressive disease in patients with lung cancer.
30 Jul 2006 - Don't forget survival, please...
30 Aug 2006 - Correlation of CDA, ERCC1, and XPD polymorphisms with response and survival in gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.
13 Mar 2008 - [The effect of multimodality induction therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer]
29 Sep 2005 - Phase II study of weekly irinotecan plus capecitabine for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.
13 Dec 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.