Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2006):

Evaluation of the decision support computer program for cancer pain management.

Full Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a decision support computer program (DSCP) for cancer pain management. DESIGN: An Internet intervention study to evaluate the usage profile, accuracy, and acceptance of the DSCP. SETTING: Internet and community settings. SAMPLE: 122 nurses working with patients with cancer were recruited through the Internet through a convenience sampling method. METHODS: The instruments included tools for registration and for evaluation of the DSCP. To evaluate the DSCP, the usage profile was measured by counting the total number of cases in which the participants used the DSCP; accuracy was measured by determining whether the decision support from the DSCP was appropriate and accurate; and acceptance was measured using the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Usage profile, accuracy, and acceptance of the DSCP. FINDINGS: Participants used the DSCP an average of 1.49 times per person (SD = 1.16). Eighty-eight percent of the participants evaluated the DSCP as appropriate and accurate. The mean scores of overall satisfaction in four major areas of the computer program ranged from 7.46-9.69. CONCLUSIONS: The DSCP could provide accurate and acceptable computerized evidence-based practice guidelines for cancer pain management. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The findings suggest that researchers should develop decision support systems in multiple aspects and dimensions of cancer pain experience and that hand-held devices would increase the usability of the DSCP.

 

Author information

Author/s: Im, Eun-Ok (EO); Chee, Wonshik (W);

Affiliation: School of Nursing, University of Texas, Austin, USA. eim(-atsign-)mail.nur.utexas.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Evaluation Studies; Journal Article

Journal: Oncology nursing forum (Oncol Nurs Forum), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2006-Sep; vol 33 (issue 5) : pp 977-82

Dates: Created 2006/09/06; Completed 2006/10/11; Revised 2007/11/15;

PMID: 16955125, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.

Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.

Related articles

These are the most related articles currently in our database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

10/13/1997
12/30/2007
Higher Relevance Score (46)
Lower Relevance Score (25)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a larger map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy LLC 2003-2010 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index