|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2006): |
Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To compare perioperative characteristics, short-term, and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) and open Burch colposuspension (OBC) for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence.
DESIGN:
Randomised surgical trial with single blinding.
SETTING:
Three tertiary level teaching hospitals involving seven surgeons of varying skill levels.
POPULATION:
Two hundred women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).
METHODS:
The two groups were treated in identical fashion, except for the laparoscopic or open approach to surgery. Attempts were made to blind the subjects and the observers obtaining outcome data to treatment group. Analyses were adjusted for surgeon experience.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Absence of USI 6 months following surgery, postoperative pain, time spent in hospital, and time to return to activities of normal daily living.
RESULTS:
There were no significant differences in objective and subjective measures of cure and in patient satisfaction at 6 months, 24 months, or 3-5 years of follow up between laparoscopic and open colposuspension groups. Laparoscopic colposuspension took longer time to perform (87 versus 42 minutes, P< 0.0001) but was associated with less blood loss (P = 0.03), less pain (P = 0.02), and quicker return to normal activities (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION:
LBC has significant advantages over traditional OBC, without any apparent compromise in short-term and long-term outcomes.To compare perioperative characteristics, short-term, and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) and open Burch colposuspension (OBC) for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Randomised surgical trial with single blinding. Three tertiary level teaching hospitals involving seven surgeons of varying skill levels. Two hundred women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). The two groups were treated in identical fashion, except for the laparoscopic or open approach to surgery. Attempts were made to blind the subjects and the observers obtaining outcome data to treatment group. Analyses were adjusted for surgeon experience. Absence of USI 6 months following surgery, postoperative pain, time spent in hospital, and time to return to activities of normal daily living. There were no significant differences in objective and subjective measures of cure and in patient satisfaction at 6 months, 24 months, or 3-5 years of follow up between laparoscopic and open colposuspension groups. Laparoscopic colposuspension took longer time to perform (87 versus 42 minutes, P < 0.0001) but was associated with less blood loss (P= 0.03), less pain (P= 0.02), and quicker return to normal activities (P= 0.01). LBC has significant advantages over traditional OBC, without any apparent compromise in short-term and long-term outcomes.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Carey, M P (MP); Goh, J T (JT); Rosamilia, A (A); Cornish, A (A); Gordon, I (I); Hawthorne, G (G); Maher, C F (CF); Dwyer, P L (PL); Moran, P (P); Gilmour, D T (DT);
Affiliation: Department of Urogynaecology at Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. mcarey(-atsign-)netlink.com.au
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (BJOG), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Sep; vol 113 (issue 9) : pp 999-1006
Dates: Created 2006/09/07; Completed 2006/10/24; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 16956331, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
Comments and Corrections
CommentIn: BJOG. 2006 Sep;113(9):985-7. (PMID: 16956328)
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit.
6 Dec 2007 - Effect of laparoscopic hysterectomy on the vascularization of the lower urinary tract.
16 Jan 2008 - Abdominal sacral colpopexy: surgical pearls and outcomes.
30 Aug 2007 - Robotic colposuspension: two case reports.
30 Aug 2007 - Initial repair of iatrogenic colon perforation using laparoscopic methods.
28 Feb 2008 - Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?
30 Jul 2007 - Postoperative hypoesthesia and pain: qualitative assessment after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
17 Aug 2007 - Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: feasibility and short-term results.
25 Sep 2007 - Oncological outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution study with >or=3 years of follow-up.
15 Oct 2007 - "Redo" fundoplications: satisfactory symptomatic outcomes with higher cost of care.
30 Oct 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.