Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2006):

Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised controlled multicentre study.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE:
To compare laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal total hysterectomy regarding influence on postoperative psychological wellbeing and surgical measures.

DESIGN:
A prospective, open, randomised multicentre trial.

SETTING:
Five hospitals in the South East of Sweden.

POPULATION:
Hundred and twenty-five women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions were enrolled in the study, and 119 women completed the study. Fifty-six women were randomised to abdominal hysterectomy and 63 to laparoscopic hysterectomy.

METHODS:
Psychometric tests measuring general wellbeing, depression and anxiety preoperatively and 5 weeks and 6 months postoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Effects of operating method on the psychological wellbeing postoperatively. Analysis of data regarding operating time, peroperative and postoperative complications, blood loss, hospital stay and recovery time.

RESULTS:
No significant differences in the scores were observed between the two groups in any of the four psychometric tests. Both the surgical methods were associated with a significantly higher degree of psychological wellbeing 5 weeks postoperatively compared with preoperatively. The operating time was significantly longer for the laparoscopic hysterectomy group, but the duration of the stay in hospital and sick-leave were significantly shorter for laparoscopic hysterectomy group compared with the abdominal hysterectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS:
General psychological wellbeing is equal after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy within 6 months after the operation. The advantages of the laparoscopic hysterectomy are the shorter stay in hospital and shorter sick-leave, but these issues must be balanced by a longer duration of the operation.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Persson, P (P); Wijma, K (K); Hammar, M (M); Kjølhede, P (P);

Affiliation: Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. par.persson(-atsign-)akademiska.se

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (BJOG), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2006-Sep; vol 113 (issue 9) : pp 1023-30

Dates: Created 2006/09/07; Completed 2006/10/24; Revised 2006/11/15;

PMID: 16956334, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

12/30/1984
6/13/2004
Higher Relevance Score (15)
Lower Relevance Score (10)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2009 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index