|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Oct 2006): |
Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures.
Full Abstract
Models of low-level saliency predict that when we first look at a photograph our first few eye movements should be made towards visually conspicuous objects. Two experiments investigated this prediction by recording eye fixations while viewers inspected pictures of room interiors that contained objects with known saliency characteristics. Highly salient objects did attract fixations earlier than less conspicuous objects, but only in a task requiring general encoding of the whole picture. When participants were required to detect the presence of a small target, then the visual saliency of nontarget objects did not influence fixations. These results support modifications of the model that take the cognitive override of saliency into account by allowing task demands to reduce the saliency weights of task-irrelevant objects. The pictures sometimes contained incongruent objects that were taken from other rooms. These objects were used to test the hypothesis that previous reports of the early fixation of congruent objects have not been consistent because the effect depends upon the visual conspicuity of the incongruent object. There was an effect of incongruency in both experiments, with earlier fixation of objects that violated the gist of the scene, but the effect was only apparent for inconspicuous objects, which argues against the hypothesis.
Author information
Author/s: Underwood, Geoffrey (G); Foulsham, Tom (T);
Affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. geoff.underwood(-atsign-)nottingham.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) (Q J Exp Psychol (Colchester)), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-Nov; vol 59 (issue 11) : pp 1931-49
Dates: Created 2006/09/21; Completed 2007/01/09; Revised 2009/11/03;
PMID: 16987782, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/3/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition.
18 Feb 2008 - Ongoing eye movements constrain visual perception.
6 Oct 2006 - Transsaccadic memory for visual object detail.
30 Dec 2001 - How many faces can be processed during a single eye fixation?
30 Dec 2003 - Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images.
30 Jul 2005 - Tests of the E-Z Reader model: exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control.
7 Nov 2005 - The role of visual and cognitive processes in the control of eye movement.
30 Dec 1989 - Attention response functions: characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load.
18 Nov 2001 - The effects of task constraints on visual search behavior and decision-making skill in youth soccer players.
30 Mar 2007 - Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets.
3 Dec 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.