Measurement of lumbar lordosis: inter-rater reliability, minimum detectable change and longitudinal variation.

Full Abstract

STUDY

DESIGN:
Repeated measures design to examine reliability and longitudinal variation of lumbar lordosis measurement.

OBJECTIVES:
To determine the interrater reliability, minimum detectable change (MDC) and longitudinal variation of the Cobb method for measuring lumbar lordosis using standardized rules.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:
The reliability of the 4-line Cobb method for measuring lumbar lordosis was not examined when standardized rules were instituted for drawing the lines.

METHODS:
A random sample of participants was selected from the Pittsburgh clinic of the multicenter Study of Osteoporotic Fractures for radiographic measurement of lumbar lordosis reliability (n=48) and stability (n=109). A standardized version of the 4-line Cobb method was used for all measurements of lordosis. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate interrater reliability for lordosis and to measure the stability of this measure over an approximate 2-year-time period. The standard error of measurement and MDC were calculated for lordosis measurement based on the ICC value.

RESULTS:
The interrater reliability coefficient for lumbar lordosis was in the excellent range (ICC=0.98; 95%

CI:
0.95, 0.99). The MDC based on measurements between raters was 3.90 degrees. The ICC value for the stability, or reliability from time 1 to time 2, of lordosis measurement over time was 0.81 (95%

CI:
0.74, 0.87).

CONCLUSION:
This study demonstrates that the 4-line Cobb method can be a highly reliable and precise method for measuring lumbar lordosis if standardized procedures are used. The Cobb method has an MDC that is appropriate for clinical use. Also, there is minimal longitudinal variation in lordosis measurements over a 2-year period.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Hicks, Gregory E (GE); George, Steven Z (SZ); Nevitt, Michael A (MA); Cauley, Jane A (JA); Vogt, Molly T (MT);

Affiliation: Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. ghicks(-atsign-)som.umaryland.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Journal: Journal of spinal disorders & techniques (J Spinal Disord Tech), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2006-Oct; vol 19 (issue 7) : pp 501-6

Dates: Created 2006/10/05; Completed 2006/12/07;

PMID: 17021414, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.