Can Self-declared Personal Values be Used to Identify those with Family Medicine Career Aspirations?

Full Abstract

PURPOSE:
Self-declaration of personal values has been suggested as a means of identifying students with greater predilection for future primary care careers. While statistically significant differences have been demonstrated, absolute differences between those interested in primary care and those interested in specialist careers tend to be small. This study's objective was to determine whether limited differences can nevertheless be used to identify those with particular interest in primary care.

METHODS:
Schwartz' values were submitted to a paired comparison design in which respondents were asked to identify the value they held most dearly for possible pairings of values. 88 medical school applicants, 57 first year medical students, 78 final year medical students, and 34 admissions interviewers participated. Applicant and medical student subgroups were analyzed as a whole and as a function of self-identified career interest (i.e., primarily interested in Family medicine or other specialty careers).

RESULTS:
The values statements were remarkably consistent (r > 0.90) between groups, regardless of which subgroups were analyzed.

DISCUSSION:
Despite apparent differences in the literature between those interested in primary care and those interested in other specialist careers, the differences are small and do not correlate with career aspirations in a way that could inform admissions decisions.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Beach, Renée A (RA); Eva, Kevin W (KW); Reiter, Harold I (HI);

Affiliation: Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Undergraduate MD program, Program for Educational Research and Development, MDCL 3522, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 3Z5.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice (Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2008-May; vol 13 (issue 2) : pp 193-202

Dates: Created 2008/04/09;

PMID: 17043916, status: In-Data-Review (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

No MeSH Headings found.

The article may not be MeSH Indexed as yet.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.