Bilateral training does not facilitate performance of copying tasks in poststroke hemiplegia.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies in rehabilitation in poststroke hemiplegia have suggested that brief periods of bilateral training improve subsequent unilateral performance of the paretic upper limb. The bilateral training protocol involved task-specific practice using both upper limbs simultaneously and homologously (such that they mirrored each other). This study aimed to determine the generalizability of the bilateral training phenomenon by replicating the work with different tasks, measures, and a different experimenter. METHODS: Five single-case experiments were performed using a within-participant multiple-baseline design. Participants with post-stroke hemiplegia underwent 25 to 40 daily training sessions involving repetitive practice of 3 copying tasks. Pen movements were recorded on a digitizing pad. During the baseline phase, participants performed tasks unilaterally with their hemiplegic limb. Bilateral therapy was then applied in a staggered fashion to each task in turn. Quality of movement was measured in terms of temporal performance (jerkiness, speed, task duration), spatial performance (accuracy of copy), and arm posture (pen tilt). RESULTS: Movement quality of the hemiplegic limb was not improved during or subsequent to regular bilateral training. CONCLUSIONS: The training phenomenon observed in previous work was not replicated when participants with hemiplegia practiced copying tasks bilaterally.

Author information

Author/s: Tijs, E (E); Matyas, T A (TA);

Affiliation: School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (Neurorehabil Neural Repair), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2006-Dec; vol 20 (issue 4) : pp 473-83

Dates: Created 2006/11/03; Completed 2007/01/05; Revised 2007/11/15;

PMID: 17082503, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.