|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Oct 2006): |
The nurses' experience of barriers to safe practice in the neonatal intensive care unit in Thailand.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe barriers nurses experienced in providing safe practice in the neonatal intensive care unit and to investigate area of errors commonly affected when nurses confronted the barriers. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive method. SETTING: Randomly selected 4 large neonatal intensive care units in Thailand. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven neonatal intensive care unit nurses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A semistructured interview of the nurses' experience of neonatal intensive care unit error, factors forming barriers to safe practice, and neonatal outcome. RESULTS: Of 245 error events, neonates were identified to suffer 126 (55.5%) adverse events. Five themes emerged as common factors obstructing nurses from incorporating safety processes into their caring roles: human susceptibility to error, system operating care weakness, problematic medical devices, poor team communication, and situational provocation. Multiple barriers were largely associated with understaffing, a sudden increase in patient acuity, multiple assignments, and an inadequate knowledge of safety in neonatal critical care, which often interacted and influenced their performance when processed to a single error occurrence. CONCLUSION: A focus on management of the potential barriers in a system-related human error approach could prevent and intercept future errors in this vulnerable population.
Author information
Author/s: Jirapaet, Veena (V); Jirapaet, Kriangsak (K); Sopajaree, Chompunut (C);
Affiliation: Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. jveena(-atsign-)chula.ac.th
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN / NAACOG (J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: -2006 Nov-Dec; vol 35 (issue 6) : pp 746-54
Dates: Created 2006/11/19; Completed 2006/12/29;
PMID: 17105639, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Cross-boundary rotational working for neonatal nurses.
29 Apr 2007 - Long hours and no breaks: a patient safety concern.
30 Oct 2006 - Should patients 'fly' on your unit?
29 Sep 2007 - Nurses' perception of error reporting and patient safety culture in Korea.
15 Jul 2007 - Patient safety in hospital acute care units.
30 Dec 2005 - Job satisfaction among neonatal nurses.
27 Feb 2006 - Strategies used by nurses to recover medical errors in an academic emergency department setting.
29 Apr 2006 - Understanding work contextual factors: a short-cut to evidence-based practice?
30 Dec 2005 - [9/10 Avoiding grave undesirable events related to temporary staffing by improving professional practices]
30 Oct 2006 - Work schedules and job performance: what's the link?
30 May 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.