Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 29 Nov 2006):

A framework for comparing video methods used to assess the clinical consultation: a qualitative study.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-channel video is an established method for assessing clinical consultation in training general practitioners; however, it is hard to infer the body language of the doctor or how information in the consultation is being integrated into the medical record. A three-channel video was developed combining the conventional view with a camera looking at the doctor's facial expression and copying the video output from the monitor. However, the choice of three channels and camera angles selected has not been critically appraised. OBJECTIVE: To develop criteria for comparing single and multi-channel approaches to video recording of the consultation. METHODS: Single channel and three-channel recordings of simulated consultations were shown to a panel of 12 health professionals and interviews were conducted to gather their opinions on the level of information presented, quality and assessment. The transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS: It was found that in providing visual information the three-channel video was superior to the single channel video. The major elements needed for comparison of the two techniques would be the ability of the video to pick up quantifiable non-verbal communication of the doctor and the patient, and the ability to qualitatively and quantitatively reflect the use and impact of the computer on the consultation. The information provided by the three-channel video could be further classified to essential, desirable and redundant to guide the future development of the multi-channel video. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-channel methods should be able to capture the following information: body language and facial expression of doctor and patient; and how the doctor's knowledge and information collected in the consultation are synthesized into the medical record.

 

Author information

Author/s: Leong, A (A); Koczan, P (P); De Lusignan, S (S); Sheeler, I (I);

Affiliation: McGill University, Faculty of Medicine, 6th Floor McIntyre Medical Sciences Building, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1Y6, Canada.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine (Med Inform Internet Med), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2006-Dec; vol 31 (issue 4) : pp 255-65

Dates: Created 2006/11/30; Completed 2007/02/28;

PMID: 17135058, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.

Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.

Related articles

These are the most related articles currently in our database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

12/30/1981
12/30/2006
Higher Relevance Score (31)
Lower Relevance Score (25)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a larger map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy LLC 2003-2010 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index