Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 17 Jan 2007):
Free Full Text!
See links below

Impaired filtering of behaviourally irrelevant visual information in dyslexia.

Full Abstract

A recent proposal suggests that dyslexic individuals suffer from attentional deficiencies, which impair the ability to selectively process incoming visual information. To investigate this possibility, we employed a spatial cueing procedure in conjunction with a single fixation visual search task measuring thresholds for discriminating the orientation of a target stimulus. Replicating preliminary findings in an earlier report, we found evidence of a striking dissociation between dyslexic participants' performance in cued and uncued conditions. Whereas uncued search results were equivalent for dyslexic and normal adult readers, the majority of dyslexic individuals failed to display a comparable benefit when the location of the target was indicated by the appearance of a brief peripheral pre-cue. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we further demonstrate that the effectiveness of the cueing task at discriminating between dyslexic and normal readers surpasses that of a range of other psychophysical tasks typically used in dyslexia research. Moreover, we find that the discriminative accuracy of the task is at least on par with measures of verbal short-term memory (a core component of phonological processing), which ranks as one of the most widely accepted areas of difficulty in dyslexia. Potential mechanisms underlying the cueing effect are outlined, and the plausibility of each considered within a signal detection theory framework of visual search. It is argued that performance benefits obtained by normal readers in cued conditions most likely reflect the prioritization of target information during decision making, and could feasibly be subserved by top-down biasing effects on pooling processes in extrastriate cortex.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Roach, Neil W (NW); Hogben, John H (JH);

Affiliation: Visual Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK. nwr(-atsign-)psychology.nottingham.ac.uk

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Brain : a journal of neurology (Brain), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Mar; vol 130 (issue Pt 3) : pp 771-85

Dates: Created 2007/03/09; Completed 2007/04/16;

PMID: 17237361, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

9/17/2007
7/21/2008
Higher Relevance Score (12)
Lower Relevance Score (10)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2009 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index